Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Service Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.

Human Services$2.8MPhilanthropy$660kEnvironment$510kHealth$108kEducation$55kInternational$45kFood & Nutrition$40kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $245k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
  • $250k+2 grants · $800k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Philanthropic Trust$550,000
The UBS Optimus Foundation$250,000
Eugene Family YMCA$200,000
Oregon Community Foundation$100,000
Sellwood Community House$30,000
Radical Assistance for Vulnerable Eugene Neighbors$25,000
End of Life Choices Oregon$25,000
Restored Connections Peer Center$25,000
Battleground Healthcare$25,000
Shift Community Cycles$25,000
AMOS Health and Hope$15,000
ACLU Foundation$15,000
Evergreen Goodwill$10,000
Giving What We Can USA$10,000
Positive Community Kitchen$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FISH of Vancouver: $25k → 9%Eugene Family YMCA: $1.3M → 15%Friends of Saturday Academy: $5k → 12%Eugene Family YMCA: $1.3M → 15%Radical Assistance for Vulnerable Eugene Neighbors: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
DE
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 5 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$3.1M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-21%
0%

Still filing today

40%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $425k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterInternationalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $2.5M · revenue -44%
  • TU
    The UBS Optimus Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k
  • SC
    Sellwood Community House
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k

Funded once

  • FO
    FISH OF VANCOUVER
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -8%
  • TA
    THE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • CP
    Crystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portland Street Medicine

We offer our homeless neighbors accessible whole-person care to improve and support health, and to bridge a gap in trust between people and systems.

Health
2
Careoregon Inc

To inspire and partner to create quality and equity in individual and community health.

Health
3
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
4
Oregon Center for Public Policy

The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…

Employment
5
Oregon Public Health Association

Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.

Health
6
Portland Trails

Over the next five years, portland trails will work to transform greater portland into a regional hub of connectivity and sustainability. by facilitating the expansion and enhancement of our trail network, we will foster inclusive…

Environment
7
Oregon Medical Association

The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…

—
8
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
9
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
10
Rimrock Trails Treatment Services

To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.

Health
11
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
12
Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades

To improve the health and wellness of the medically uninsured or critically underserved through the engagement of professionals, community partners, and dedicated volunteers.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheltercare and the most unlike its peers is Positive Community Kitchen. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHospice Care ServicesCommunity Health CentersCancer Support OrganizationsHomeless Services & ShelterAnimal Rescue and AdoptionEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Lgbtq+ Community CentersSouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Food Pantries & AssistanceProfessional Ballet Compani…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Community Arts OrganizationsYmca Community Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%10%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr19%35%20–35yr12%14%35–55yr16%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr19%18%20–35yr12%4%35–55yr16%73%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,400

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
10/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE — $2,503,783 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE+3 more — $55,000 · Human ServicesThe UBS Optimus Foundation — $500,000 · OtherThe UBS Optimus Foundat…Eugene Family YMCA — $200,000 · OtherEugene Family YMCASellwood Community House — $40,000 · Other+17 more — $155,000 · Other+17 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $550,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTH…THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUN…+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyRESTORED CONNECTIONS PEER CENTER — $25,000 · HealthBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE — $25,000 · HealthTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION — $15,000 · HealthAMOS HEALTH AND HOPE INC — $15,000 · HealthCASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $5,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthEND OF LIFE CHOICES - OREGON — $25,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsLGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER FUND — $10,000 · EducationCentral Lane Robotics Inc — $10,000 · EducationWESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationOREGON PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY — $5,000 · EducationShift Community Cycles — $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$2,558,783Other$895,000Philanthropy$660,000Health$90,000Civil Rights$40,000Education$30,000Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE — $2,503,783 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $550,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShift Community Cycles — $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetRESTORED CONNECTIONS PEER CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetEND OF LIFE CHOICES - OREGON — $25,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFISH OF VANCOUVER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRADICAL ASSISTANCE FOR VULNERABLE EUGENE NEIGHBORS — $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCrystal Peaks Youth Ranch Co — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORTED SHELTERS — $14,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPositive Community Kitchen — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLGBTQ COMMUNITY CENTER FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCENTER FOR CARBON REMOVAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Lane Robotics Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIV ALLIANCE — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPONSORS INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASCADE AIDS PROJECT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTERCARE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN NEW ENGLAND UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE BIRD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOREGON PERFORMING ARTS ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFarmers Market Fund — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SATURDAY ACADEMY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Lane Community Health…The Autzen FoundationPacificsource Foundat…Chambers Family Found…The Robert D and Marc…The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Food for Lane CountyJuan Young Trust
The Oregon Community FoundationOR33× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Lane Community Health Council · The Autzen Foundation · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement · Chambers Family Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Food for Lane County · Juan Young Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Service Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Farmers Market Fund — 100% of income from government
  • Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
  • Restored Connections Peer Center — 54% of income from government
  • Sheltercare — 18% of income from government
  • Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
  • Shift Community Cycles — 9% of income from government
  • Sponsors Inc — 8% of income from government
  • White Bird — 2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Western New England University — 1% of income from government
  • Community Supported Shelters — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home