Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Seeley Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$741k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Arts & Culture$1.8MEnvironment$848kHealth$387kCommunity Improvement$265kEducation$211kPhilanthropy$181kAnimals$137kRecreation & Sports$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $417k
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF BRIDGER-TETON$105,000
KANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOC$100,000
GEORGE MASON UNIVERISTY FDN$100,000
OWEN COX DANCE GROUP$62,000
KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY$50,000
WELLSPRING HEALTH ACCESS$45,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY VIRGINIA$40,000
WETA PUBLIC TELEVISION AND RADIO$35,000
COMMUNITY FDN OF JACKSON HOLE$30,100
CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY$25,606
FRIENDS OF DRAGON RUN$25,000
CHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION$20,000
BACH ARIA SOLOISTS$18,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$15,000
WYOMING PUBLIC MEDIA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ID
NY
WY
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 30 repeat orgs$104k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
10

Total granted

$3.8M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+13%

Still filing today

57%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $605k · revenue +91%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $340k · revenue +21%
  • OC
    OWEN COX DANCE GROUP
    6× · 2020–2025 · $299k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CR
    CAPITAL REGION LAND CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +69%
  • GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue -28%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FISH CREEK
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States

Impart knowledge and appreciation of humanity's relationship with wildlife through art.

Arts & Culture
5
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
6
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
7
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
8
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
9
Tohono Chul Park Inc

We are a community oasis where reverence for the cultural and natural ecology of the sonoran desert region inspires responsible stewardship so that future generations may thrive.

Environment
10
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
11
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
12
Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc

See attached schedule othe conservancy has sole responsibility for managing all aspects of the rose kennedy greenway, including horticulture, programming, public art, maintenance, and capital improvements. we envision a vibrant, inclusive,…

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Chelsea Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic University Foundatio…Community FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Elementary Literacy TutoringProfessional Ballet Compani…Community Arts OrganizationsClassical Music EnsemblesLand Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%46%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%37%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FRIENDS OF BRIDGER-TETON — $321,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF BRIDGER-TETONTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $300,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYIndividual grant recipient — $295,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY FND OF JACKSON HOLE — $260,100 · OtherCOMMUNITY FND OF JACKSON HOLEWETA PUBLIC TELEVISION AND RADIO — $187,000 · OtherWETA PUBLIC TELEVISION AND RADIOPLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MOUNTAINS — $110,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD ROCKY MOUNTAINSCHELSEA FUND INC — $98,000 · Other+16 more — $352,306 · Other+16 moreKANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION — $605,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATIONKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $340,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY SYMPHONYOWEN COX DANCE GROUP — $299,000 · Arts & CultureOWEN COX DANCE GROUPCHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION — $141,000 · Arts & CultureCHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATIONBACH ARIA SOLOISTS INC — $105,000 · Arts & CultureBACH ARIA SOLOISTS INC+7 more — $68,100 · Arts & CultureGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $125,000 · HealthCIRCLE OF HOPE HEALTH CARE SVCS INC — $80,000 · HealthTHE FRIENDS OF THE CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY INC — $87,140 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $63,200 · PhilanthropyGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $15,000 · PhilanthropyNATURE COLLECTIVE — $100,000 · EnvironmentFriends of Dragon Run Inc — $25,000 · EnvironmentCAPITAL REGION LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $25,000 · Environment+2 more — $8,000 · EnvironmentCHELSEA'S FUND — $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,923,906Arts & Culture$1,558,100Education$211,000Health$205,000Philanthropy$165,340Environment$158,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION — $605,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY SYMPHONY — $340,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOWEN COX DANCE GROUP — $299,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $210,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION — $141,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBACH ARIA SOLOISTS INC — $105,000 over 6y, 18% of budgetNATURE COLLECTIVE — $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF THE CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY INC — $87,140 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF HOPE HEALTH CARE SVCS INC — $80,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $63,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSURFING HERITAGE AND CULTURE CENTER — $28,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetFriends of Dragon Run Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAPITAL REGION LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHELSEA'S FUND — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY RADIO INC — $16,100 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetGRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ACTORS THEATRE INC — $13,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetFriends of Idaho Public Television Inc — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION 23 — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetQUAIL BOTANICAL GARDENS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO MUSEUM OF ART — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO READ — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEEWINOT INSTITUTE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KANSAS CITY BALLET ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY SYMPHONY
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds OWEN COX DANCE GROUP
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds BACH ARIA SOLOISTS INC
  • Who funds NATURE COLLECTIVE
  • Who funds CHELSEA FUND INC
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF THE CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY INC
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF HOPE HEALTH CARE SVCS INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE
  • Who funds SURFING HERITAGE AND CULTURE CENTER
  • Who funds Friends of Dragon Run Inc
  • Who funds CAPITAL REGION LAND CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds CHELSEA'S FUND
  • Who funds JACKSON HOLE COMMUNITY RADIO INC
  • Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY ACTORS THEATRE INC
  • Who funds Friends of Idaho Public Television Inc
  • Who funds Astoria Park Conservancy
  • Who funds WINTER WILDLANDS ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds FOUNDATION 23

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richard J Stern Foundation for the Arts Commerce Bank TrusteeMO15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richard J Stern Foundation for the Arts Commerce Bank Trustee · Muriel McBrien Kauffman Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Seeley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph