· Private foundation
The Seabury Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $103k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $890k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GROW BENZIE | $32,000 |
| OAK PARK AND RIVER FOREST HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $29,500 |
| INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEDIA CENTER (ICMC) | $25,000 |
| FAMILY MATTERS | $25,000 |
| BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER | $25,000 |
| FACETS MULTI-MEDIA | $25,000 |
| PROJECT EDUCATION PLUS | $25,000 |
| MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS | $25,000 |
| READING IN MOTION | $25,000 |
| GARDENEERS CO JOHN MARSHALL METROPOLITAN HIGH SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS | $25,000 |
| WEST TOWN BIKES | $25,000 |
| BENZIE SENIOR RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| INGENUITY | $25,000 |
| TARGET HOPE COLLEGE PREPARATORY ACADEMY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
86 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS2× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +68%
- THTarget Hope2× · 2020–2021 · $75k · revenue +81%
- FMFAMILY MATTERS INC3× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- OPOAK PARKRIVER FOREST HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2021 · $32k
- OPOAK PARK AND RIVER FOREST HIGHone grant, 2022 · $32k
- HAHOPE ACADEMY INCone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…
Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Teatro Vista Productions is a non-profit theatre-based company dedicated to multidisciplinary artists of color whose artistic expression on stage and beyond is rooted in the transformative power of owning and telling our own stories.
Definition Theatre celebrates stories created with, inspired by, and intended for the people and communities of color. Through the act of making, Definition expands perspectives, stewards resources, and bridges the immense possibility…
Create connections between diverse artists seeking mutual growth through collaboration.
To build a foundation for the individual artistic growth of dancers and choreographers, providing a laboratory from which early career artists propel themselves and the art form to a new level through training, collaboration, mentorship,…
Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…
Rivendell Theatre Ensemble is a professional Equity company dedicated to elevating the lives of women through the power of theatre.
The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…
To use multiple artistic forms (primarily dance and music) and the combined talents of our diverse company to convey intense personal narratives. We are proudly and visibly multicultural, exploring the intersection of heritage, culture,…
To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Humanities Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Goldin Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 174 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BENZIE AREA CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds Cool Classics Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GOLDIN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds Target Hope ↗
- Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds GROW BENZIE INC ↗
- Who funds READING IN MOTION ↗
- Who funds AGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds The Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds Mudlark Theater Company NFP ↗
- Who funds Piven Theatre Workshop ↗
- Who funds BLACK ENSEMBLE THEATER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS MEDIA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Facets Film Forum ↗
- Who funds FIRST DESCENTS ↗
- Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GARDEN THEATER ↗
- Who funds WORKING IN THE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds FOR LOVE OF WATER ↗
- Who funds Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT EDUCATION PLUS ↗
- Who funds Chicago Heightening Opportunity and Potential for ↗
- Who funds READING QUEST ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds The Musical Arts Institute ↗
- Who funds LITERACY WORKS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CHICAGO DANCE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS IN THE GAME NFP ↗
- Who funds TUTORING CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Austin Childcare Providers Network ↗
- Who funds SNOW CITY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Field Foundation of Illinois · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · The Seabury Foundation · The Albert Pick Jr Fund · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · Reva and David Logan Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Seabury Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Portland Community College Foundation Inc — 5% of income from government
- Hermitage Artist Retreat Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Seabury Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Seabury Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.