· Private foundation
The Schwallie Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $23k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ORG FOR AUTISM RESEARCH | $60,000 |
| THE INSTITUTE FOR EXCEPTIONAL CARE | $5,000 |
| SOUTHEASTERN OHIO LEGAL SERVICES | $5,000 |
| SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
| ORATORY PREP SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| HARAMBEE MINISTRIES | $1,500 |
| THE OUTREACH CONNECTION FOOD PANTRY | $1,500 |
| ALL SAINTS LOS ANGELES | $1,000 |
| AUTISM CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNI | $1,000 |
| WOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $900 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200 |
| RIDING HIGH FARM | $200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100 |
| ST GREGORY THE GREAT PARISH | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +68% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALEGAL AID OF SOUTHEAST AND CENTRAL OHIO4× · 2022–2025 · $13k · revenue +127%
- IFInstitute for Exceptional Care3× · 2023–2025 · $11k · revenue +150%
- CCCOLLEGE CHOICE FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +188%
Funded once
- AAAUTISTRY-THE ART OF AUTISMone grant, 2021 · $5k
- AOARC OF SOMERSET- DEVELOPMENTAL DISAone grant, 2020 · $3k
- JCJENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +77%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nassau suffolk services for the autistic (nssa) offers hope to people with autism and their families by providing high quality life-long support through services which enable people with autism to function better in everday life. nssa…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Hospital for Special Care is a 236-Bed Rehabilitation and Chronic Disease hospital, serving patients in these primary areas: Inpatient and Outpatient Rehabilitation.
The mission of nyc autism charter schools is to provide individualized, scientifically based educational services to children with autism and other pervasive development disorders.
Amid the proliferation of advice about treatment options for autism, the ability to access accurate information about research-validated approaches is critically important to those seeking effective treatment.
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
Serve children and adults who suffer from genetic and other complex medical disorders by providing comprehensive medical, laboratory, and consultative services, and by increasing and disseminating knowledge of science and medicine.
Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.
Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.
The center for discovery offers individuals with a range of disabilities and medical frailties - and their families - innovative educational, clinical, residential, social and creative arts experiences designed to enrich their lives…
The organization offers services to assist people with severe disabilities achieve, maintain, and improve upon an independent lifestyle.the approved mcil mission statement since january 26, 2018, has been and remains: removing barriers,…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Center Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF SOUTHEAST AND CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds Institute for Exceptional Care ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE CHOICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARAMBEE CHRISTIAN FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN AUTISM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JENNINGS CENTER FOR OLDER ADULTS ↗
- Who funds AUTISM CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds WOODLANDS WILDLIFE REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds NASSANS PLACE ↗
- Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Schwallie Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- Nassans Place — 3% of income from government
- CROSSROADS4HOPE — 1% of income from government
- Eden Autism Services Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Schwallie Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Schwallie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.