Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Schnitzer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$104kScience & Tech$101kHealth$79kReligion$76kCivil Rights$62kEducation$50kArts & Culture$46kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $87k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$879k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REPROTLC$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$5,000
ACLU$5,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$5,000
YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH$5,000
HIAS$5,000
THE ARK$5,000
6TH AND I SINAGOGUE DC$5,000
TEMPLE BETH JACOB$4,050
KAM ISAIAH ISRAEL CONGREGATION$3,100
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE$3,073
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$3,000
SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $3k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $3k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $1k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $500 → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
CA
MD
NC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$560k · 42 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
12

Total granted

$560k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+40%

Still filing today

48%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationEnvironmentReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2019–2025 · $53k · revenue +57%
  • RT
    Repro TLC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +348%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +202%
  • 2C
    21ST CENTURY CHORALE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Field Museum of Natural History; the most unlike its peers is New Hampshire Center for Public Interest Journalism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
28/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU: $40,000 · OtherACLUTHE ARK: $40,000 · OtherTHE ARKK A M ISAIAH ISRAEL CONGREGATION: $33,660 · OtherK A M ISAIAH ISRAEL CONGREGATIONTemple Beth Jacob: $19,398 · OtherTemple Beth Jacob6TH AND I SINAGOGUE DC: $19,000 · Other6TH AND I SINAGOGUE DCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $17,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - ORIENTAL INSTITUTE: $15,000 · OtherFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $20,000 · OtherFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORYUniversity of Chicago: $12,500 · Other+40 more: $132,385 · Other+40 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $53,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND…JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $43,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DBA JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $7,628 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …Repro TLC: $40,000 · HealthRheumatology Research Foundation: $7,500 · HealthBENEDICTINE SCHOOL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · ReligionYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $14,000 · Religion+1 more: $500 · ReligionHIAS INC: $29,000 · InternationalThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $31,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $500 · Food & NutritionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $22,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$349,443Philanthropy$103,628Health$47,500Religion$44,500International$42,000Food & Nutrition$32,000Crime & Legal$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $53,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRepro TLC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $31,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBENEDICTINE SCHOOL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHIAS INC: $29,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $20,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL: $9,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $8,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DBA JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $7,628 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetRheumatology Research Foundation: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $4,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST JOURNALISM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCasey Trees: $708 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LONDON BARN PLAYHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Repro TLC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds BENEDICTINE SCHOOL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds YIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE HUMANITIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DBA JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
  • Who funds Rheumatology Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds MCDONOGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FORESTS ↗
  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH19× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Schnitzer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Schnitzer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schnitzer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph