Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Samuel Salmanson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$33kReligion$30kHealth$21kEducation$10kArts & Culture$7kHuman Services$6kCivil Rights$4kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$800
Median grant
4
States reached
$379k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF DANA FARBER$3,500
TEMPLE SINAI$2,000
MISC GIFTS 250$1,700
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH$1,300
TEMPLE ISRAEL$1,050
DR PATRICK O'GARA RESEARCH FUND$1,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$800
WASHINGTON LATIN PUBLIC CHARTER SCH$500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
BHUTAN FOUNDATION$500
ACLU$500
COMMUNITY SERVINGS$250
MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS$140
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%One Family Inc: $100 → 8%ONE FAMILY INC: $100 → 8%Room To Grow National Inc: $200 → 16%Pine Street Inn: $250 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $100 → 16%PINE STREET INN: $100 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $250 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $100 → 16%Community Servings: $100 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $100 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $100 → 16%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $100 → 16%HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $125 → 16%Cradles to Crayons: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$105k · 29 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
38

Total granted

$105k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
+12%

Still filing today

41%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CORPORATION OF THE WASHINGTON LATIN SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +161%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +62%
  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • FA
    FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +41%
  • DM
    DR MARTIN SOLOMON MEDICAL EDUCATIO
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • BS
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
8
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shelter Animal Reiki Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Friends of Dana Farber: $23,636 · OtherFriends of Dana FarberTemple Sinai: $15,247 · OtherTemple SinaiTEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED: $11,373 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATEDMISC GIFTS 250: $7,745 · OtherMISC GIFTS 250Dr Patrick O'Gara Research Fund: $5,000 · OtherTHE GODNICK CENTER: $4,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM: $3,475 · Other+40 more: $31,261 · Other+40 moreCORPORATION OF THE WASHINGTON LATIN SCHOOL: $8,000 · EducationCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $6,180 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $500 · PhilanthropyFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,657 · Arts & CultureEncore Stage and Studio Inc: $1,600 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $1,065 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,000 · HealthSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $300 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $250 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $750 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $450 · Human ServicesONE FAMILY INC: $200 · Human ServicesROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $200 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $125 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $100 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $800 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $500 · International
Other$101,737Education$8,000Philanthropy$6,680Arts & Culture$6,422Health$3,850Human Services$2,325International$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCORPORATION OF THE WASHINGTON LATIN SCHOOL: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $6,180 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $2,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPRING LAKE RANCH INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $1,657 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEncore Stage and Studio Inc: $1,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bhutan Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF FINE ARTS: $1,065 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC: $750 over 6y, 0.0% of budget2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC: $680 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $636 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSILENT SPRING INSTITUTE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAMILY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Dreams Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORPORATION OF THE WASHINGTON LATIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRING LAKE RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Encore Stage and Studio Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Bhutan Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds 2LIFE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HOUSTON SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER ANIMAL REIKI ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Samuel Salmanson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Samuel Salmanson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Silent Spring Institute Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • 2LIFE Communities Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
  • One Family Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samuel Salmanson’s filings →

More from the funding graph