Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$155MEducation$22MHuman Services$8.1MPhilanthropy$4.1MInternational$2.7MFood & Nutrition$1.4MRecreation & Sports$1.1MHealth$818kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $938k
  • $250k+7 grants · $29M
$225,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$176M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH$25,289,785
NISTAR$1,125,000
MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$496,604
V HECHZAKTA BO$350,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND$325,000
FRIENDS OF SINAI TRUST$250,000
MIRIAM'S WELL -- BE'ER MIRIAM$225,000
YAD EZRA$215,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$179,250
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN-ENDELMAN & GITELMAN FUND$130,000
B'NAI BRITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION$75,000
NCSY$64,000
HEBREW DAY SCHOOL OF ANN ARBOR$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HILLEL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NISTAR: $1.5M → 8%NISTAR: $1.1M → 8%NISTAR: $650k → 8%NISTAR: $100k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $50k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188M · 30 repeat orgs$5.1M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
11

Total granted

$188M
$4.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+334%

Still filing today

60%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15M · revenue +71% · 28% of their budget
  • HD
    HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT
    7× · 2017–2023 · $13M · revenue +59% · 61% of their budget
  • N
    NISTAR
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.3M · revenue ×11 · 100% of their budget

Funded once

  • TR
    TALI RA'ANANA SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $2.3M
  • NS
    NEW SCHOOL IN ISRAEL
    one grant, 2022 · $2.3M
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH TESILO EMMANUAL TIKVAH
    one grant, 2020 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
5
Yeshiva Har Torah

A religious school providing teaching facilities of jewish faith, history, literature, jewish life and ideals.

—
6
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
7
Friends of Yeshiva Sifsei Tzadik

Support higher jewish education

Religion
8
Hebrew Free Loan Association

The association provides financial assistance to jewish people in the state of michigan through the lending of money without interest in accordance with core jewish values, respect, compassion, and confidentiality.

Philanthropy
9
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
Aish Hatorah Detroit

To ignite jewish passion and empower every jew to embrace their heritage, thereby ensuring the vibrant continuity of the jewish epople.

Religion
12
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH: $125,202,739 · OtherYESHIVATH BETH YEHUDAH+28 more: $17,394,728 · Other+28 moreHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $12,640,082 · EducationHILLEL DAY …PARTNERS IN TORAH INC: $4,087,775 · EducationPARTNERS IN…JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $2,950,000 · EducationJEAN AND SA…+1 more: $10,000 · EducationMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $15,100,000 · Arts & CultureMESORAH H…YESHIVA HAKAYITZ OF DETROIT: $671,665 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR KEHILLA GROWTH: $7,536,433 · ReligionFRIENDS OF THE SINAI TRUST: $1,270,000 · Religion+1 more: $35,000 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $2,746,604 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,361,000 · PhilanthropyNISTAR: $3,335,000 · Human Services+1 more: $50,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND: $2,720,000 · International
Other$142,597,467Education$19,687,857Arts & Culture$15,782,665Religion$8,841,433Philanthropy$4,107,604Human Services$3,385,000International$2,720,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $15,100,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $12,640,082 over 7y, 61% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR KEHILLA GROWTH: $7,536,433 over 6y, 89% of budgetPARTNERS IN TORAH INC: $4,087,775 over 4y, 95% of budgetNISTAR: $3,335,000 over 4y, 100% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $2,950,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetV'HECHZAKTA BO: $2,770,000 over 8y, 31% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $2,746,604 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND: $2,720,000 over 8y, 85% of budgetYAD EZRA: $1,428,000 over 7y, 7.7% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO: $1,361,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE SINAI TRUST: $1,270,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetFRESH AIR SOCIETY: $1,127,438 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $783,284 over 4y, 60% of budgetYESHIVA HAKAYITZ OF DETROIT: $671,665 over 6y, 89% of budgetHATZALAH OF MICHIGAN: $455,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $300,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHebrew Day School of Ann Arbor: $100,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR KEHILLA GROWTH ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds NISTAR ↗
  • Who funds JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds V'HECHZAKTA BO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE SINAI TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA HAKAYITZ OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Day School of Ann Arbor ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT CHESED PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of DetroitMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Detroit · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Karp Family Foundation · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Stanley and Judith Frankel Family Foundation · Schostak Family Support Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Pappas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage’s filings →

More from the funding graph