Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$648k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of THE BRUCE H AND ROSALIE N ROSEN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $159k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $231k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER$250,050
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$130,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$50,335
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATIONS$50,335
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$44,959
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION - MICHIGAN$40,000
JARC$20,000
LUBAVITCH FOUNDATION$18,000
JEWISH HOSPICE AND CHAPLAINCY$16,100
ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$10,203
VARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY$10,075
W DAVIDSON JEWISH COLLEGE LOAN$2,500
STAND WITH US$1,063
HADASSAH$1,000
TAMARACK CAMPS$800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $156k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JCC CHICAGO: $500 → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $6k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $3k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $725 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $550 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25 → 8%HIGHER HOPES: $282 → 8%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $550 → 8%JARC: $40k → 8%JARC: $20k → 8%JARC: $20k → 8%JARC: $20k → 8%JARC: $20k → 8%JARC: $20k → 8%HEART 2 HEART DETROIT: $500 → 8%JARC: $50 → 8%HEART 2 HEART DETROIT: $25 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
UT
VA
MD
KS
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 62 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
46

Total granted

$2.7M
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+34%

Still filing today

52%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $511k · revenue +133%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    7× · 2018–2024 · $280k · revenue +206%
  • THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $251k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • OS
    OLD SCHOOL SQUARE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
3
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

6
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation

Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…

Health
8
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
9
Isabella Geriatric Center Inc

Operating as isabella center for rehabilitation and nursing care, isabella is a 705-bed not-for-profit organization that is a member of the mjhs health system family. isabella is committed to providing exceptional short-term, sub-acute…

Human Services
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service and the most unlike its peers is The Cortney Gives Bak Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Educational and Reli…International Development S…Family and Children SupportAnimal Rescue and Shelter S…Health Advocacy and SupportDetroit Community Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%3%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr18%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%21%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%50%35–55yr18%25%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/70
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,786

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
45/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE — $393,826 · OtherADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUEALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION — $282,675 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY — $276,473 · OtherVARIETY THE CHILDREN'S CHARITYMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $276,340 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALLUBAVITCH FOUNDATION — $102,000 · OtherLUBAVITCH FOUNDATION+89 more — $155,589 · Other+89 moreHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $511,262 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL C…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $25,600 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $7,568 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $280,075 · InternationalAMERICAN F…+1 more — $6,063 · InternationalJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $252,813 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FED…UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $14,000 · PhilanthropyHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $10,050 · Philanthropy+3 more — $286 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $251,340 · EducationTHE UNIVE…+4 more — $4,205 · EducationJARC — $140,400 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $13,975 · Human Services+5 more — $1,932 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $51,067 · Religion+2 more — $625 · Religion
Other$1,486,903Arts & Culture$544,430International$286,138Philanthropy$277,149Education$255,545Human Services$156,307Religion$51,692

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $511,262 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $280,075 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $252,813 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $251,340 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJARC — $140,400 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $51,067 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $25,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $13,975 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $10,050 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYAD EZRA — $7,942 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $6,063 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $3,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $3,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKADIMA — $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC — $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRI COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MICHIGAN — $550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART 2 HART DETROIT INC — $525 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $468 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG — $429 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHER HOPES — $282 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $121 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITYVEST INC — $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB METRO DETROIT — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $95 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORTNEY GIVES BAK FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEversight — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JARC
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YAD EZRA
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE
  • Who funds HILLEL OF BROWARD AND PALM BEACH INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation CorporationMI30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · United Jewish Foundation · Mickey Shapiro Charitable Trust · Grosfeld Foundation · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Woll-Yellin Family Foundation · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Detroit

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph