Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ruth Danley and William Enoch Moore Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$4.6MArts & Culture$1.2MFood & Nutrition$399kHousing & Shelter$380kReligion$366kCommunity Improvement$238kYouth Development$87kHuman Services$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $859k
$50,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OYATE HOPE ACADEMY$150,000
MENAUL SCHOOL$125,000
RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC$120,000
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$112,500
LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY$75,951
MICA GROUP INC$65,000
ST MARY'S MISSION SCHOOL$60,856
BUNDLED ARROWS INC$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEQUOYAH COUNTY$50,000
FUNDAMENTAL NEEDS INC$50,000
UIM INTERNATIONAL$30,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF$25,000
CALIFORNIA INDIAN NATIONS COLLEGE$20,000
NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION$20,000
INDIAN BIBLE COLLEGE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE HOPI SCHOOL HOPITUTUQAIKI: $80k → 26%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $100k → 28%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $150k → 12%BUNDLED ARROWS INC: $98k → 14%MENAUL SCHOOL: $240k → 14%RED WILLOW CENTER INC: $75k → 18%LAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM: $95k → 40%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $150k → 42%THROUGH PISCATAWAY EYES: $75k → 8%MICA GROUP INC: $75k → 19%ST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $90k → 28%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $113k → 12%MENAUL SCHOOL: $180k → 14%RED WILLOW CENTER INC: $70k → 18%LAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM: $75k → 40%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $100k → 42%MICA GROUP INC: $74k → 19%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $100k → 12%MENAUL SCHOOL: $125k → 14%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $100k → 42%MICA GROUP INC: $70k → 19%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $100k → 12%MENAUL SCHOOL: $125k → 14%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $90k → 42%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $80k → 12%MENAUL SCHOOL: $108k → 14%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $82k → 42%ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $75k → 12%MENAUL SCHOOL: $100k → 14%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $76k → 42%MENAUL SCHOOL: $100k → 14%LAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $73k → 42%MENAUL SCHOOL: $100k → 14%OYATE CONCENR INC: $165k → 42%OYATE HOPE ACADEMY: $150k → 42%OYATE CONCERN INC: $125k → 42%OYATE CONCENR INC: $115k → 42%OYATE CONCENR INC: $100k → 42%OYATE CONCENR INC: $100k → 42%OYATE CONCENR INC: $88k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $120k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $120k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $100k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $100k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $100k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $100k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $90k → 42%RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC: $75k → 42%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MT
MN
NY
SD
IA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
NM
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.7M · 19 repeat orgs$659k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$6.7M
$353k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-7%

Still filing today

37%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $306k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $720k · revenue +49% · 36% of their budget
  • MG
    MICA GROUP INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $542k · revenue ×15 · 33% of their budget
  • BA
    BUNDLED ARROWS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $338k · revenue +67% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • OC
    OYATE CONCERN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue +87% · 60% of their budget
  • SN
    SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • LL
    LAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -84%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Circle of Nations

To build academic achievement and foster healthy development of the whole child in an intertribal environment.

Education
2
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
3
Native American Ministries Inc

The mission of Native American Christian Academy is to provide an educational environment that brings the students to use the best of their ability. Moral and ethical development, life skills, social interaction are all addressed in…

Education
4
Institute of American Indian Arts & Alaska Native

To provide education and instruction in the scholarly study and preservation of indian art to empower creativity and leadership in native arts and cultures through higher education, life-long learning and outreach.

Education
5
Northwest Indian College

To provide postsecondary educational opportunities to meet the academic, vocational, and cultural needs of native american communities in the northwest and to provide education programs in order to promote indigenous self-determination and…

Education
6
Little Priest Tribal College

Little priest tribal college is established as an educational institution by the winnebago tribe of nebraska to fulfill the goal of its namesake, chief little priest, "be strong and educate my children".

Education
7
Oglala Lakota College

The mission which emanates from the charter of the oglala sioux tribe is to educate students for professional and vocational employment opportunities in lakota country. the college will graduate well-rounded students grounded in…

Education
8
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
9
Salish School of Spokane

Dynamic Salish language revitalization powering cultural renewal and building a stronger, healthier community.

Education
10
Santa Fe Indian School

Provide educational and residential opportunities for native american children in grades 7-12.

Education
11
Wiley College

Provide a liberal arts education with globally focused endeavors to provide an intellectually stimulating environment, promoting student competencies in communication, as well as critical and analytical thinking.

Education
12
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wolakota Waldorf Society; the most unlike its peers is Sunshine Bible Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
7/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL: $805,000 · OtherRED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOLWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $720,481 · OtherWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETYST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $656,500 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOLOYATE CONCENR INC: $618,000 · OtherOYATE CONCENR INCST MARY'S MISSION SCHOOL: $259,856 · OtherST MARY'S MISSION SCHOOLST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOL: $252,000 · OtherST MICHAEL INDIAN SCHOOLLAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM: $210,000 · OtherRed Willow Center: $208,338 · OtherUNITED INDIAN MISSIONS INC: $205,000 · Other+9 more: $557,370 · Other+9 moreMENAUL SCHOOL: $1,078,475 · EducationMENAUL SCHOOLSunshine Bible Academy: $194,970 · EducationSunshine Bible AcademyOYATE HOPE ACADEMY: $150,000 · EducationOYATE HOPE ACADEMY+4 more: $155,567 · Education+4 moreMICA GROUP INC: $542,039 · Arts & CultureMICA GROUP INCBUNDLED ARROWS INC: $338,256 · Arts & CultureBUNDLED ARROWS…LAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLAKOTA LANGUAG…Fundamental Needs Inc: $190,567 · Food & NutritionOYATE CONCERN INC: $125,000 · ReligionBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentTwo By Two Character Development: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsMONTANA WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $10,000 · Environment
Other$4,492,545Education$1,579,012Arts & Culture$930,295Food & Nutrition$190,567Religion$125,000Youth Development$37,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENAUL SCHOOL: $1,078,475 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetWOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY: $720,481 over 8y, 36% of budgetMICA GROUP INC: $542,039 over 8y, 33% of budgetBUNDLED ARROWS INC: $338,256 over 6y, 27% of budgetRed Willow Center: $208,338 over 3y, 39% of budgetSunshine Bible Academy: $194,970 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetFundamental Needs Inc: $190,567 over 5y, 27% of budgetOYATE HOPE ACADEMY: $150,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetOYATE CONCERN INC: $125,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetLILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INC: $85,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetNKWUSM: $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEQUOYAH COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetINDIAN BIBLE COLLEGE: $35,567 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF: $25,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Indian Nations College: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNative American Advancement Corporation: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTwo By Two Character Development: $12,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENAUL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WOLAKOTA WALDORF SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MICA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds BUNDLED ARROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Red Willow Center ↗
  • Who funds Sunshine Bible Academy ↗
  • Who funds Fundamental Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds OYATE HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds OYATE CONCERN INC ↗
  • Who funds LILLIAN VALLELY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKOTA LANGUAGE CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds NKWUSM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SEQUOYAH COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FLAGSTAFF ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds California Indian Nations College ↗
  • Who funds Native American Advancement Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Two By Two Character Development ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company FoundationNC15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Novo Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ruth Danley and William Enoch Moore Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ruth Danley and William Enoch Moore Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Native American Advancement Corporation: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth Danley and William Enoch Moore’s filings →

More from the funding graph