Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rosen Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$1.7MEnvironment$900kArts & Culture$706kFood & Nutrition$674kHealth$513kHuman Services$426kCommunity Improvement$250kMembership Benefit$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $153k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $240k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.5M
$30,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION$250,000
LAKEVIEW METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENTER$250,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$100,000
MINNESOTA AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROM INC FOUNDATION$70,000
NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION$70,000
MONOGRAM FOODS LOVES KIDS FOUNDATION$40,000
FAIRMONT AREA COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$12,500
CAREGIVERS RESPONSE EFFORT & SERVICE TEAM$10,704
HEAVEN'S TABLE FOOD SHELF$10,000
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$10,000
AGAPE COMMUNITY OUTREACH$10,000
PAUL'S PANTRY INC$10,000
LONG PRAIRIE FOOD PANTRY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AGAPE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $10k → 8%CAREGIVERS RESPONSE EFFORT & SERVICE TEAM: $50k → 11%CAREGIVERS RESPONSE EFFORT & SERVICE TEAM: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Rosen Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Rosen Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 11 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -10% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$3.5M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
-15%

Still filing today

82%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $363k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +12%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $500k · revenue +43%
  • MH
    MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $206k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +166% · 79% of their budget
  • GB
    GIBBON BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -94% · 100% of their budget
  • WF
    WISE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -40% · 63% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

2
Midwest Food Bank Nfp

It is the mission of midwest food bank to share the love of christ by alleviating hunger and malnutrition and providing disaster relief.

Human Services
3
Mill City Farmers Market Charitable Fund

Mission: to support a healthier community through partnerships, educational programming, and support for organic farmers and local food producers.vision: to grow a just, local, sustainable food system by sharing resources and collaborating…

Arts & Culture
4
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
5
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
6
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

7
Minnesota State Fair Foundation

The minnesota state fair foundation's mission is to preserve and improve the historic minnesota state fairgrounds and support state fair programs and projects in agriculture, arts & culture, education, the environment, and history.

Philanthropy
8
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
9
Second Harvest Foodbank of North Central Ohio

To grow hope in our region by creating pathways to nutritious food.

Food & Nutrition
10
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
11
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

12
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Ffa Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caregivers Response Effort & Servic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%14%<5yr12%5%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr16%19%35–55yr18%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%10%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%15%35–55yr18%44%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 14% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
10%
3,829/38,965

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
5/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOU…NEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC — $280,000 · EducationNEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRIC…WISE FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationWISE FOUNDATION+1 more — $6,000 · EducationTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $400,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYMINNESOTA AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROM INC FOUNDATION — $297,500 · OtherMINNESOTA AGRICULTURE IN…CITY OF GIBBON — $75,000 · OtherCITY OF GIBBONGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $100,000 · OtherGOLDEN HOUSE INCCAREGIVERS RESPONSE EFFORT & SERVIC — $60,702 · OtherLAKESIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $105,587 · OtherLAKESIDE CEMETERY FOUNDA…Monogram Foods Loves Kids Foundation — $40,000 · Other+7 more — $70,000 · Other+7 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSE…MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $206,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA HISTO…LAKEVIEW METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENTER — $250,000 · HealthLAKEVIEW ME…CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthCENTRACARE …+1 more — $12,500 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $500,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILD…GIBBON BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN MINNESOTA INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Community ImprovementFAIRMONT AREA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $180,000 · Recreation & Sports
Education$1,941,000Other$1,148,789Arts & Culture$706,000Health$512,500Environment$500,000Community Improvement$250,000Recreation & Sports$180,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $1,005,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF GREEN BAY INC — $500,000 over 1y, 79% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - RIVER FALLS FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetNEBRASKA FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION FOR AGRICULTURE INC — $280,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetLAKEVIEW METHODIST HEALTH CARE CENTER — $250,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $206,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIBBON BEAUTIFICATION FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFAIRMONT AREA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $180,000 over 3y, 79% of budgetWISE FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetLAKESIDE CEMETERY FOUNDATION — $105,587 over 2y, 69% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCAREGIVERS RESPONSE EFFORT & SERVIC — $60,702 over 2y, 25% of budgetSOUTHERN MINNESOTA INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMonogram Foods Loves Kids Foundation — $40,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF MID-NEBR — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAVENS TABLE FOOD SHELF — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGAPE Community Outreach — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSECOND CHANCES — $10,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetMINNESOTA FFA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Land O'Lakes FoundationMN16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Land O'Lakes Foundation · Juanita E Schmeeckle Charitable Trust · Minnesota Community Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rosen Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rosen Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Rosen Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph