Skip to content
The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$13M
Granted FY2024still arriving
318
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$612k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$19MInternational$13MArts & Culture$9.3MReligion$7.0MHealth$5.2MCommunity Improvement$4.8MHuman Services$2.6MPhilanthropy$2.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 318 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k92 grants · $340k
  • $10k–50k133 grants · $3.0M
  • $50k–250k89 grants · $8.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$206M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VICTORIA & ALBERT MUSEUM (V&A)$612,130
ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES$400,000
CITY OF HOPE$333,333
HILLEL AT UCLA$250,000
SONDUK EL YANABIA (YANABIYA)$201,000
SONDUK EL YANABIA (YANABIYA)$201,000
HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL STUDIES$200,000
UCLA ZIMAN CENTER FOR REAL ESTATE$200,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$200,000
HELEN DILLER INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH LAW AND ISRAEL STUDIES$200,000
BERKELEY HILLEL$200,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY$193,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$166,667
FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES$166,667
UCLA Y&S NAZARIAN CENTER FOR ISRAEL STUDIES$166,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 75% of grant dollars ($58M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 25% that went abroad ($20M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE JEWISH ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 17%THE JEWISH ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 17%THE JEWISH ALLIANCE INC: $50k → 17%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $50k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $50k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $50k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $25k → 14%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $40k → 14%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $35k → 14%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 14%PUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 14%THE KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $50k → 14%THE KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $50k → 14%THE KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $25k → 14%THE KARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER: $25k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $60k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $58k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $60k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $60k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $60k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%FULFILLMENT FUND: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%WESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
NM
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Beyond the US: 25% of all-years giving ($20M)

4 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$18M · 356 grants
United Kingdom$1.2M · 5 grants
Austria$158k · 7 grants
Italy$42k · 2 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 55%.

The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 35% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70M · 279 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

279 repeat relationships: 176 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

279
112

Total granted

$70M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+24%

Still filing today

70%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $302k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +85%
  • AA
    ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +459%

Funded once

  • COMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -13%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $98k · revenue +267%
  • The Education Trust Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
2
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
3
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
4
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
5
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
6
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
Jewish Film Institute

The Jewish Film Institute champions bold films and filmmakers that expand and evolve the Jewish story for audiences everywhere. Through its exhibition and artist development programs, JFI celebrates the spirit of film, inquiry,…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
10
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
11
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
12
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Enter the Jewish Peoplehood Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is So Ca Bulldog Rescue Southern California Bulldog Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

302 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 302 of the 434 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
68
Early backer (in before they grew)
292/302
Grantees still filing
201/302
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $2,490,167 · OtherCITY OF HOPEMATI - JERUSALEM BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1,925,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,850,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,550,000 · Other+115 more: $35,793,873 · Other+115 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $4,519,959 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $1,640,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CAL…FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $1,266,967 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CA…The Institute for College Access & Success: $825,000 · EducationThe Institute for…AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $488,600 · EducationCOLLEGE ACCESS PLAN: $441,000 · EducationBRIGHT PROSPECT: $435,000 · Education+15 more: $1,705,500 · Education+15 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $3,493,565 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,400,000 · InternationalAMERICAN IS…FRIENDS OF ELNET: $725,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $600,118 · InternationalWASHINGTON …The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $375,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC: $300,000 · International+5 more: $639,000 · International+5 moreAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $1,114,500 · Arts & CultureAmerican F…MUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $1,008,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM ASS…INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $495,000 · Arts & CultureINSTITUTE …WALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $460,500 · Arts & CultureWALLIS ANN…LOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $302,500 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $290,000 · Arts & Culture+21 more: $3,042,516 · Arts & Culture+21 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $505,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $420,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $223,000 · Human ServicesPUKUU CULTURAL COMMUNITY SERVICES: $210,750 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $180,000 · Human ServicesTHE SCAN FOUNDATION: $175,000 · Human ServicesFULFILLMENT FUND: $167,625 · Human ServicesKARSH FAMILY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesENTER THE JEWISH PEOPLEHOOD ALLIANCE INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesWESTSIDE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSION: $85,000 · Human Services+1 more: $37,500 · Human ServicesALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES: $1,611,875 · Science & TechAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE US - ISRAEL BINATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $400,000 · Science & TechLos Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust: $622,500 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $525,000 · EnvironmentRESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $283,877 · EnvironmentPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL: $100,000 · EnvironmentTHE FUNDERS NETWORK INC: $85,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $67,500 · EnvironmentTataviam Land Conservancy: $65,000 · Environment
Other$43,609,040Education$11,322,026International$7,532,683Arts & Culture$6,713,016Human Services$2,408,875Science & Tech$2,011,875Environment$1,748,877

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $4,519,959 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $3,493,565 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $1,640,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES: $1,611,875 over 7y, 24% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,400,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $1,266,967 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra: $1,114,500 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $1,008,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHILLEL AT UCLA: $943,500 over 7y, 12% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $887,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetThe Institute for College Access & Success: $825,000 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $725,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetLos Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust: $622,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $600,118 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetLABC INSTITUTE: $600,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC: $559,588 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetBERKELEY HILLEL: $550,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $534,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $530,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $525,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCalMatters: $510,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $505,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $495,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $488,600 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetKCRW FOUNDATION INC: $475,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWALLIS ANNENBERG CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $460,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY CAREGIVER ALLIANCE: $455,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetCOLLEGE ACCESS PLAN: $441,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetBRIGHT PROSPECT: $435,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $420,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $400,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE US - ISRAEL BINATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $386,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $383,990 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $375,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $359,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION JUMP START: $342,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $302,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY: $300,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $290,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $283,877 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMotivating Our Students Through Experien EXPERIENCE (MOSTE): $262,340 over 6y, 19% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $260,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $250,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $236,049 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKOUNKUEY DESIGN INITIATIVE INC: $225,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $223,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALTASEA AT THE PORT OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT UCLA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds The Institute for College Access & Success ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KORET ISRAEL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ELNET ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Neighborhood Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds LABC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds CalMatters ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Jewish Community Foun…The Annenberg Foundat…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …Weingart FoundationLiberty Hill Foundati…The Rose Hills Founda…Jewish Federation Cou…The Eli and Edythe Br…The California Endowm…The Stanley & Joyce B…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA88.5× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · The California Endowment · The Stanley & Joyce Black Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
72report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 434 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home