Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rones Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$148kYouth Development$105kEducation$89kInternational$88kReligion$70kHuman Services$65kArts & Culture$40kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL THERAPY FUND$40,000
PROJECT EXTREME$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$17,500
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$15,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOPSITAL$10,000
FRESH START$7,000
KESHET$5,000
MERKAZ TORAH V'CHESED$5,000
ET ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$3,500
NCSY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,525
GRACE CENTER OF HOPE$2,500
YESHIVA OF GREATER MONSEY$1,500
FANTASY CARES$1,090
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 42% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%WOMEN'S CTR OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%ET ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $4k → 21%SHALVA: $5k → 14%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN: $500 → 8%SANCTUM HOUSE: $11k → 8%DETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NJ
CA
CO
TN
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$527k · 17 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$527k
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+4%

Still filing today

53%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME
    7× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue +20%
  • HD
    HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT
    4× · 2018–2022 · $75k · revenue +39%
  • JH
    JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
    4× · 2018–2021 · $22k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SH
    SANCTUM HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -1%
  • JT
    JET THEATRE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • MM
    MARY'S MANTLEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
9
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
10
Yotzer Ohr Inc

Our school is run on a system of mutual respect, for teachers, administration and students. in a warm and caring environment, full of creativity and multi-faceted approaches to education, we ignite a spark in each girl to love hashem and…

Education
11
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Et Alumni Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL THERAPY FUND: $90,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL THERAPY FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJEWISH SENIOR LIFE: $34,000 · OtherJEWISH SENIOR LIFETHE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $30,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATREST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOPSITAL: $30,000 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOPSITALFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEYAD EZRA: $15,000 · OtherMERKAZ TORAH VCHESED: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $50,525 · Other+13 moreHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $75,000 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCH…DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $14,000 · EducationDENVER JEWISH …JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $87,475 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONA…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP EXTREME …+1 more: $1,090 · Youth DevelopmentSANCTUM HOUSE INC: $11,400 · Human ServicesMARY'S MANTLE: $10,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $7,000 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Human ServicesET Alumni Association Inc: $3,500 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 · HealthJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $22,000 · ReligionYECHIDA: $5,000 · ReligionHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $13,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $300 · Philanthropy
Other$334,525Education$89,000International$88,475Youth Development$81,090Human Services$42,400Health$29,000Religion$27,000Philanthropy$13,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $87,475 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME: $80,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $75,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $30,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $22,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $14,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $13,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSANCTUM HOUSE INC: $11,400 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMARY'S MANTLE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDETROIT CHESED PROJECT: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYECHIDA: $5,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKESHET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetET Alumni Association Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 92% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFantasy Cares: $1,090 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP EXTREME D/B/A PROJECT EXTREME ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH ENSEMBLE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUM HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S MANTLE ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT CHESED PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds YECHIDA ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds ET Alumni Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fantasy Cares ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family FoundationMI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · Ahavas Avraham Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rones Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rones Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rones Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rones Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rones’ filings →

    More from the funding graph