Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rogers Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$82kEducation$67kPhilanthropy$59kFood & Nutrition$38kArts & Culture$18kRecreation & Sports$6kHuman Services$5kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION$10,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$2,000
HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK$2,000
FRIENDS OF WESTPORT PARKS & REC$2,000
FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION$2,000
MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE$2,000
WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY$1,000
FRIENDS OF N CASTLE PUB LIBRARY$1,000
CAMPHILL FOUNDATION$1,000
MUHLENBERG COLLEGE$500
SMITH COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
VA
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 28 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
16

Total granted

$198k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+72%

Still filing today

46%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $57k · revenue +113%
  • KS
    KING SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +40%
  • HA
    HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • RW
    RAYLIGN WELL BEING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • SV
    ST VINCENTS CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • BH
    BYRAM HILLS SCHOOL FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
9
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
10
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Molloy University

Molloy university, an independent catholic university, rooted in the dominican tradition of study, spirituality, service, and community, is committed to academic excellence with respect for each person. through transformative education,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amherst College Trustees; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RAYLIGN WELL BEING FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherRAYLIGN WELL BEING FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF N CASTLE PUB LIBRARY: $7,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF N CASTLE PUB LIBRARYTHE KING SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $6,000 · OtherTHE KING SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDFARE: $5,000 · OtherBYRAM HILLS SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $4,000 · Other+23 more: $37,300 · Other+23 moreADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 · PhilanthropyADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATIO…BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD ALLERGY…KING SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationKING SCHOOL…THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $3,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEE…MUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $3,500 · EducationMUHLENBERG …CAMPHILL SOLTANE: $2,000 · EducationCAMPHILL SO…THE HARVEY SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationTHE HARVEY …President and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC: $13,500 · HealthHEMOPHILI…CHARLEY'S FUND INC: $8,000 · HealthCHARLEY'S…MyClinic Inc dba HealthyMe: $2,000 · HealthMyClinic …MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $1,500 · Arts & CultureRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PALM BEACH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $500 · Arts & CultureBROWN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · Community ImprovementCAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Human Services
Other$109,300Philanthropy$58,500Food & Nutrition$30,000Education$28,200Health$23,500Arts & Culture$12,500Community Improvement$12,000Human Services$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC: $56,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetKING SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLEY'S FUND INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCAMPHILL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUHLENBERG COLLEGE: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPHILL SOLTANE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMyClinic Inc dba HealthyMe: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARVEY SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PALM BEACH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADMIRALS COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds KING SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEMOPHILIA ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MALTZ JUPITER THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLEY'S FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL SOLTANE ↗
  • Who funds BALLENISLES CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MyClinic Inc dba HealthyMe ↗
  • Who funds THE HARVEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rogers Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rogers Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • The Palm Beach Symphony Society Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rogers Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph