Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roger J Trinchero Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$890kCrime & Legal$830kFood & Nutrition$465kHealth$290kCommunity Improvement$125kPhilanthropy$102kRecreation & Sports$75kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANV FOOD BANK$200,000
PARENTS CAN$190,000
PRESCHOOL FOR ALL$150,000
10000 DEGREES$100,000
MENTIS$100,000
COMMUNITY RESOURCES$100,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
QA COMMONS$73,200
ST HELENA COOPERATIVE NURSERY$55,000
ON THE MOVE$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $825k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY ACTIION OF NAPA VALLEY: $200k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $200k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTIION OF NAPA VALLEY: $200k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTIION OF NAPA VALLEY: $100k → 9%ON THE MOVE: $25k → 9%MENTIS: $100k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 8 repeat orgs$723k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +113% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
3

Total granted

$3.4M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+7%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $945k · revenue +165% · 27% of their budget
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $700k · revenue +40%
  • 1D
    10000 DEGREES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • SH
    ST HELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • NV
    NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • OT
    ON THE MOVE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
2
Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa County

The child abuse prevention council (capc) strives to promote the safety of children and prevent child abuse by raising community awareness, educating our community and providing resources and support to families.

Community Improvement
3
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
4
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement
5
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
6
The Rp Group Inc

The Research and Planning Group for California Community Colleges (The RP Group)is a leader that supports equitable outcomes for minoritized and marginalized students through race-conscious, equity-minded research, planning, and…

Education
7
Child Action Inc

Child Action, Inc. is a private, nonprofit corporation founded in 1976 to promote the education and social welfare of children and families and to advocate on their behalf. See Schedule O for further details.

Human Services
8
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
9
Opportunity Junction Inc

To help motivated contra costa county job seekers develop the skills and confidence to launch careers that lead to financial security.

Employment
10
National College Advising Corps Inc

College advising corps (cac) is the nation's largest nonprofit service organization dedicated to advancing educational equity and expanding opportunity for all high school students. cac provides college enrollment and career guidance to…

Education
11
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
12
California Competes

Established in 2011, our mission is to help transform the state's higher education system into an engine of economic opportunity that empowers all californians, particularly those from underserved communities, to achieve their full…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Napa Valley Child Advocacy Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Carpy Gang Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESCHOOL FOR ALL: $600,000 · OtherPRESCHOOL FOR ALLST HELENA COOPERATIVE NURSERY: $265,000 · OtherST HELENA COOPERATIVE NURSERYIndividual grant recipient: $225,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCANV FOOD BANK: $200,000 · OtherCANV FOOD BANKCommunity Resources for Children: $190,000 · OtherCommunity Resources for ChildrenCOMMUNITY RESOURCES: $100,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCESST HELENA ROTARY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherST HELENA ROTARY FOUNDATIONNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY: $75,000 · Other+1 more: $50,000 · OtherNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $945,000 · HealthNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCAC…COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $700,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NA…MENTIS: $100,000 · Human ServicesMENTIS+1 more: $25,000 · Human Services10000 DEGREES: $400,000 · Education10000 DEGREESQA COMMONS INC: $73,200 · EducationQA COMMONS IN…Carpy Gang Alumni Association: $75,000 · Recreation & SportsBoston Foundation Inc: $2,125 · Philanthropy
Other$1,805,000Health$945,000Human Services$825,000Education$473,200Recreation & Sports$75,000Philanthropy$2,125

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $945,000 over 5y, 27% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $700,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budget10000 DEGREES: $400,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children: $190,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMENTIS: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCarpy Gang Alumni Association: $75,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetQA COMMONS INC: $73,200 over 1y, 16% of budgetON THE MOVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $2,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Community Resources for Children ↗
  • Who funds MENTIS ↗
  • Who funds Carpy Gang Alumni Association ↗
  • Who funds QA COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peter a & Vernice H Gasser FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roger J Trinchero Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roger J Trinchero Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roger J Trinchero Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph