· Private foundation
The Roe Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $130k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC | $211,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $200,000 |
| NEIGHBORS LINK CORPORATION | $111,264 |
| THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING | $106,355 |
| UTAH FILM CENTER | $100,000 |
| PEBBLE BEACH COMPANY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| CONSERVAMERICA | $100,000 |
| ELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY | $75,000 |
| ANDREW SABIN FAMILY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| FORDHAM UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| OZUAH FAMILY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| ELON UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI | $25,000 |
| A1 STIGMA FREE COALITION | $10,000 |
| FLORIDA FOSTER CARE REVIEW | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
42 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $316k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC4× · 2021–2024 · $630k · revenue +82%- SFSOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY6× · 2019–2024 · $485k · revenue +21%
- NLNEIGHBORS LINK CORP6× · 2019–2024 · $462k · revenue +274%
Funded once
- STSTRONGER THAN EVERone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -7%
- FFFOUNDATION FOR NEW YORKS STRONGEST INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +30%
- TSTHE STATUE OF LIBERTY-ELLIS ISLANDone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…
The purpose and activities of dana-farber, inc. are to promote and support the exempt missions of dana-farber cancer institute and to provide investment management services.
The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…
The national fragile x foundation serves the entire fragile x community to live their best lives by providing the knowledge, resources, and tools until, and even after, more effective treatments and a cure are achieved.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Beth's Furry Friends Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
98 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 98 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACT FOR NIH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE TIME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH FORK NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds Fordham University ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ANDREW SABIN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING TREATMENT AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ↗
- Who funds DANIEL FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ELLIS ISLAND HONORS SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET ↗
- Who funds Pebble Beach Company Foundation ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOSTER CARE REVIEW INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STRONGER THAN EVER ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR NEW YORKS STRONGEST INC ↗
- Who funds DANIAL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE BUGATTI TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE CANTOR FITZGERALD RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOE AND KAY CALVANESE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE TRACK MIND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Fraydun Foundation Inc · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Mbia Foundation · Select Equity Group Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Maniatty & Walker Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Roe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mill River Collaborative Inc — 100% of income from government
- Foster Care Review Inc — 33% of income from government
- Stamford Center for the Arts Inc — 18% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Stamford Inc — 17% of income from government
- Connecticut Community Care Inc — 15% of income from government
- United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Roe Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Roe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.