· Private foundation
The Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAPA COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM | $5,000 |
| CITY OF CALISTOGA FD | $4,400 |
| SOUTH LAKE CO FPD | $4,100 |
| UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS | $4,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MAMARIN ART GARDEN CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $40k
- MAMARIN ART AND GARDEN2× · 2020–2021 · $40k
- SLSOUTH LAKE CO FIRE3× · 2019–2021 · $17k
Funded once
- MOMARIN OPEN SPACE TRUSTone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -90%
- MAMarin Art and Garden Centergraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +131%
- NVNAPA VALLEY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAMone grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Bay Nature connects the people of the San Francisco Bay Area to our natural world and motivates people to solve problems with nature in mind. Our vision is that all people have a close relationship with theirnatural world.
The purpose of the organization is to monitor, manage, and preserve conservation easements it stewards in northern california. the organization acquires conservation easements in land exhibiting important natural features to protect and…
To protect and sustain the unique lands, waters, and biodiversity of west marin.
The vitality of open spaces is essential to the health of our earth, air, water, native plants, and animals. Our goal is to ensure that the beauty, diversity, and fullness of our wild lands continue to enrich and sustain all generations of…
The Official Partner to the Point Reyes National Seashore Since 1964, Point Reyes National Seashore Association focuses on three priorities: Youth Education & access, environmental conservation and building a broad community for the people…
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
At Yosemite Rivers Alliance, we unite conservation and community to protect and restore the three rivers that ?ow through the Yosemite Regionthe Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and Merced.
To promote understanding of the relations between people and the biosphere and to conserve, protect, and celebrate terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems of northern California and southern Oregon.
To conserve lands for recreational, educational, ecological, agricultural, scenic & open space opportunities. We develop & maintain public access ways & trails to the ocean, rivers & other natural or scenic features along coastal Mendocino…
The primary purpose of the organization is the preservation, protection, aquisition, and/ or enhancement of land in its natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, forested and open space condition in the greater sacramento valley…
How this is measured
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARIN OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
- Who funds Marin Art and Garden Center ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds NAPA COMMUNITY ANIMAL RESPONSE TEAM ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds TULEYOME ↗
- Who funds ONE TREE PLANTED INC ↗
- Who funds MARIN CONSERVATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Napa Valley State Parks Association ↗
- Who funds QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Mary a Crocker Trust · Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore?
Find your warmest path to The Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Rockridge Foundation Co Morgan Livermore’s filings →