Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roberts Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$144k
Granted FY2022
19
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Roberts Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Sheridan Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Roberts Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $144k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
5
’18
6
’19
7
’20
2
’21
8
’22
3
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.2MHuman Services$193kHealth$96kYouth Development$79kFood & Nutrition$54kArts & Culture$50kEducation$42kRecreation & Sports$39kOther$0
02FY2022 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k12 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $125k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,300
CHAPS$25,000
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOPSITAL FOUND$20,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$20,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$15,000
ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION$10,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$10,000
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$4,000
RANCHO CIELO YOUTH CAMPUS$3,000
SHS BOOSTER CLUB$2,500
CHILDREN'S CENTER$2,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LIBRARY$2,000
MUSEUM AT THE BIG HORNS$1,625
GENESIS FOUNDATION$1,000
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HUB ON SMITH: $20k → 10%HUB ON SMITH: $20k → 10%CHILDREN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%ADVOCACY AND RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 10%GENESIS FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 23 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
19

Total granted

$556k
$86k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-20%

Still filing today

39%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $94k · revenue +226%
  • SC
    SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • AB
    ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $35k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • SM
    SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SC
    SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • K
    K-LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shoshoni Senior Citizens Inc

The purpose of the entity is to provide activities, wellness and nutrition programs for senior citizens in shoshoni, wy and the surrounding area.

Human Services
2
Wyldflower Learning Community Inc

To provide students a learning environment where they can develop independence, cultivate passions, and grow the skill sets needed to be successful and fulfilled in life

—
3
Cheyenne County Community Center Foundation

Dedicated to serving the health, wellness, recreational, and social needs of cheyenne county and surrounding area

—
4
Wyoming Sheep Foundation
Food & Nutrition
5
Sheridan Kids Life

Christian ministry reaching youth for christ in sheridan, wyoming and the surrounding areas.

Youth Development
6
Wyoming Food Coalition Wy Food Matters
Food & Nutrition
7
Sherman County Community Services Inc

To provide a community service by providing a place where a family can enjoy a safe environment

Community Improvement
8
Sheyenne Valley Community Foundation

Organlized and operated to receive, manage and distribute gifts made to the foundation for charitable, religious, educational, literary or scientific purposes within barnes, ransom and griggs counties of north dakota

Philanthropy
9
Sheridan Community Center

To provide and maintain a community center/building that offers space for various events and organizations in sheridan, texas and the local surrounding area.

Human Services
10
Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming

Provide activities for low income children

Youth Development
11
Wyoming County Healthcare Center Ii
Health
12
Sheridan County Historical Society

Preserve and share our rich heritage, engaging present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies; the most unlike its peers is The Shack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHERIDAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,222,458 · PhilanthropySHERIDAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $94,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCK…Individual grant recipient: $65,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHAPS: $64,500 · OtherCHAPSSHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOPSITAL FOUND: $60,000 · OtherSHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOPSITAL FOUNDGREEN HOUSE LIVING FOR SHERIDAN: $50,000 · OtherGREEN HOUSE LIVING FOR SHERIDANBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $50,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSSHERIDAN COUNTY MUSEUM: $24,000 · Other+39 more: $206,566 · Other+39 moreSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $40,000 · Human ServicesGENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CENTER: $2,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $26,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC: $11,000 · HealthSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,222,458Other$614,366Human Services$47,500Recreation & Sports$35,000Crime & Legal$26,000Health$11,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES: $94,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES: $26,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGENESIS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetROOTED IN WYOMING: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRANCHO CIELO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBIG HORN EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,050 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWYO THEATRE INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA NORTHERN ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds SHERIDAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHACK ↗
  • Who funds ROOTED IN WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO CIELO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · The Herbert & Dorothy Zullig Foundation · Bf & Rose H Perkins Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation · The Riggs Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roberts Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roberts Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Roberts Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Roberts Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roberts Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph