Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$272k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$497kHealth$150kEducation$89kCommunity Improvement$75kCivil Rights$50kHuman Services$34kFood & Nutrition$20kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$50,000
PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION$35,000
WYO THEATRE$25,000
SAGE COMMUNITY ARTS$15,000
THE BRINTON MUSEUM$15,000
THE HUB ON SMITH STREET$15,000
CENTER FOR VITAL COMMUNITY$15,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF EASTERN BIGHORNS$10,000
WYOMING PUBLIC MEDIA$10,000
SHERIDAN CIVIC THEATRE GUILD$10,000
SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$10,000
SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SHERIDAN SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%SHERIDAN SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $10k → 10%ADVOCACY & RESOURCES CENTER: $5k → 10%ADVOCACY & RESOURCES CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$994k · 27 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$994k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+40%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
    5× · 2018–2025 · $130k · revenue +1%
  • TN
    THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +40%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $29k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +34%
  • S
    SAGE
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • ML
    Main Line Adult Day Center
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wyldlife Fund

To unite people to advance wyoming wildlife habitat, research, and education.

Animals
2
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
3
Wyoming Outdoor Council

The wyoming outdoor council's mission is to protect wyoming's environment and quality of life now and for future generations.

Environment
4
Wyoming Wildlife Federation

Wyoming wildlife federation delivers leadership in conservation for the state's wildlife, hunters, anglers, and conservationists through policy, education, advocacy, and habitat.

Animals
5
Wyoming Governor's Residence Foundation

To enhance the wyoming governor's residence and support the initiatives of the first spouse.

6
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
7
Teton Arts Council Inc

Cultivation and celebration of the arts.

Arts & Culture
8
Wyoming State Fair Foundation

To ensure that the Wyoming State Fair serves as a vibrant celebration of our states agriculture, youth, education, heritage, and industry, while evolving to meet the needs of future generations. WSFF is the fundraising arm of the WSF,…

Recreation & Sports
9
Central Wyoming Hospice & Transitions

To companion the end of life journey with skill and compassion.

10
Wyoming Donor Alliance

The wyoming donor alliance supports a network of statewide organizations focused on increasing civic participation.

Public Benefit
11
Wyoming Dementia Care

Help families and caregivers of those with Alzheimers and Dementia related illnesses care for their loved ones. Direct services provide: support, encouragement, access to community resources & techniques to help meet challenges of caring…

Housing & Shelter
12
Wyoming Foundation for Cancer Care Inc

To reduce the impact of cancer on wyoming residents diagnosed with cancer by providing non-medical, charitable financial assistance and by providing free education and screening opportunities to residents not diagnosed with cancer.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wyoming Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Tandem Productions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number36%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr12%25%10–20yr11%10%20–35yr12%45%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value36%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr12%26%10–20yr11%3%20–35yr12%56%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 36% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/23
the rest of the field
9%
103/1,100

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $105,000 · OtherSHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE HUB ON SMITH STREET — $70,000 · OtherTHE HUB ON SMITH STREETSHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $65,000 · OtherSHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATIONSAGE COMMUNITY ARTS — $60,000 · OtherSAGE COMMUNITY ARTSCENTER FOR VITAL COMMUNITY — $50,000 · OtherCENTER FOR VITAL COMMUNITYIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $30,500 · OtherSHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherSHERIDAN CIVIC THEATRE GUILD — $28,000 · Other+19 more — $154,500 · Other+19 moreTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $130,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A…WYO THEATRE INC — $122,500 · Arts & CultureWYO THEATRE INCTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH — $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD B…+2 more — $11,000 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $29,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $20,000 · EducationOberlin College — $10,000 · EducationSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $20,000 · Human ServicesADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD GROUP INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · Recreation & SportsCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC — $14,000 · Health
Other$633,000Arts & Culture$308,500Education$59,000Human Services$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Recreation & Sports$18,000Health$14,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $130,000 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetWYO THEATRE INC — $122,500 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetTHE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH — $45,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FOOD GROUP INC — $20,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN BIGHORNS INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC — $14,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMain Line Adult Day Center — $11,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST — $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOberlin College — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALTERNATIVE ELDER LIVING INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOEY'S FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTANDEM PRODUCTIONS — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDOG & CAT SHELTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
  • Who funds WYO THEATRE INC
  • Who funds THE NEW MUSEUM AT THE BRADFORD BRINTON RANCH
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN COUNCIL
  • Who funds THE FOOD GROUP INC
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE EASTERN BIGHORNS INC
  • Who funds ANTELOPE BUTTE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC
  • Who funds Main Line Adult Day Center
  • Who funds SHERIDAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST
  • Who funds Oberlin College
  • Who funds ADVOCACY & RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVE ELDER LIVING INC
  • Who funds ROARING FORK FRIENDS OF THE THEATER INC
  • Who funds JOEY'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMPASS CENTER FOR FAMILIES
  • Who funds TANDEM PRODUCTIONS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott FoundationWY34.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Joe and Arlene Watt Foundation Inc · The Roberts Family Foundation · Homer A Jr & Janet Scott Family Foundation · The Seidler Foundation · Dan & Jeanne Scott Family Foundation · Chandler H Kibbee and Mercedes K Kibbee Foundation for Children · William F Welch & Lorene W Welch Foundation · The Riggs Foundation · Wolf Creek Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Muriel and Seymour Thickman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph