Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert S & Star Pepper Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$725k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.5MHealth$1.3MReligion$485kArts & Culture$422kCrime & Legal$420kEducation$303kHuman Services$300kSocial Science$100kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$565k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHALL FOUNDATION FOR COMM HEALTH$300,000
POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES$100,000
MERCY FOUNDATION$100,000
THE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$100,000
HERITAGE FOUNDATION$50,000
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL$25,000
HOOVER INSTITUTE$15,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$15,000
HUMAN COALITION$10,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Human Coalition: $70k → 5%Human Coalition: $35k → 5%EveryONE Matters Ministries: $10k → 6%Human Coalition: $25k → 5%EVERYONE MATTERS MINISTRIES: $5k → 6%Human Coalition: $25k → 5%EVERYONE MATTERS MINISTRIES: $5k → 6%HUMAN COALITION: $25k → 5%Human Coalition: $25k → 5%HUMAN COALITION: $25k → 5%HUMAN COALITION: $10k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 24 repeat orgs$393k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+5%

Still filing today

75%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MERCY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +73%
  • MR
    MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER
    4× · 2019–2023 · $328k · revenue +33%
  • Conservative Partnership Institute
    4× · 2018–2021 · $290k · revenue +548%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • BC
    BAYSIDE COVENANT CHURCH GRANITE BAY ROSEVILLE CA
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • CA
    Child Advocates of El Dorado County
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
4
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
7
The Foundation for the Constitution

The Foundations Mission is to enhance our understanding of the Constitution and our constitutional history.

Social Science
8
Foundation for Public Affairs

Our mission is to conduct and support research on issues and trends that affect the practice of public affairs and organizations' ability to thrive in a dynamic business environment. Our research provides actionable intelligence on…

Public Benefit
9
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
11
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
12
Media Matters for America

Dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the u.s. media.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Energy for Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $405,000 · OtherPOWERHOUSE MINISTRIES INCMARSHALL FOUNDATION FOR COMM HEALTH: $300,000 · OtherMARSHALL FOUNDATION FOR COMM HE…Los Rios Colleges Foundation: $152,000 · OtherLos Rios Colleges FoundationAmerican Center for Law Justice: $120,000 · OtherAmerican Center for Law JusticeLos Rios Community College District: $100,000 · OtherLos Rios Community College Dist…THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $65,000 · OtherFAIR OAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $55,000 · Other+10 more: $167,000 · Other+10 moreLeadership Institute: $695,000 · Public BenefitLeadership InstituteJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $260,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $190,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION+3 more: $77,500 · Public Benefit+3 moreMERCY FOUNDATION: $1,008,160 · HealthMERCY FOUNDATIONMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $328,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RES…OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $75,902 · Arts & CultureOREGON SH…+2 more: $18,000 · Arts & CultureConservative Partnership Institute: $290,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Education+2 more: $16,000 · EducationPacific Legal Foundation: $220,000 · Crime & LegalAmerica First Legal Foundation: $45,000 · Crime & LegalHUMAN COALITION: $240,000 · Human ServicesEVERYONE MATTERS MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Human ServicesEnergy For Mission: $5,000 · Religion
Other$1,364,000Public Benefit$1,222,500Health$1,008,160Arts & Culture$421,902Education$346,000Crime & Legal$265,000Human Services$260,000Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMERCY FOUNDATION: $1,008,160 over 9y, 2.8% of budgetLeadership Institute: $695,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $328,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $290,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $260,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN COALITION: $240,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $220,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLos Rios Colleges Foundation: $152,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $75,902 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetAmerica First Legal Foundation: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEA PARTY PATRIOTS FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetCenter for Renewing America Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYONE MATTERS MINISTRIES: $20,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTAKE NOTE TROUPE INC: $13,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budget916 INK: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnergy For Mission: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetYoung America's Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetState Freedom Caucus Network Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSACRAMENTO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MERCY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Los Rios Colleges Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds America First Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEA PARTY PATRIOTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Renewing America Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EVERYONE MATTERS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TAKE NOTE TROUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds 916 INK ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Energy For Mission ↗
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
  • Who funds State Freedom Caucus Network Inc ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS17.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Dignity Health · Donors Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert S & Star Pepper Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert S & Star Pepper Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robert S & Star Pepper Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Robert S & Star Pepper Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert S & Star Pepper’s filings →

More from the funding graph