Skip to content
The Robert Mize & Isa White Trimble Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Robert Mize & Isa White Trimble Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$145k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$339kEducation$229kHuman Services$121kYouth Development$114kArts & Culture$81kRecreation & Sports$41kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$27,500
TEACH FOR AMERICA$20,000
BROADWAY FOR ALL$12,000
EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS$10,000
IMENTOR$10,000
HOPE HILL CHILDRENS HOME$10,000
ARC OF WESTCHESTER FOUNDATION$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$10,000
NOURISH BRIDGEPORT$5,000
FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
LIVE OUT LOUD$5,000
SCOTT FINNERAN SCHOLORSHIP FUND$5,000
FRACTURED ATLAS$5,000
IMMSCHOOLS$5,000
RESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $10k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $5k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $5k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $5k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $5k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $3k → 9%ST JOSEPHS PARENTING CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
SD
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$900k · 22 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
12

Total granted

$900k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+83%

Still filing today

73%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BRAVEN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $56k · revenue +329%
  • II
    IMENTOR INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +21%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NL
    Navy League of the united states
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • WC
    WESTERN CONNECTICUT COUNCIL NLUS
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • OS
    ONE SPIRIT
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
2
Institute for Nonprofit Practice Inc

The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…

Human Services
3
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
4
Teach for All Inc

Develop collective leadership to ensure all children have the opportunity to fulfill their potential.

Education
5
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
6
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
7
Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation or global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—
8
Partnership With Children Inc

Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.

—
9
Studentsponsor Partners Inc

Student/sponsor partners harnesses the power of quality education and mentorship to help low-income and academically average new york city youth escape the cycle of poverty and reach their highest potential.

Education
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
12
Onegoal

Onegoal (the organization") is a nonprofit organization incorporated on june 13, 2003 to provide underserved students with the resources, support, and network to earn a postsecondary degree.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of New York City; the most unlike its peers is Navy League of the united states. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
12/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $127,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $90,000 · OtherNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHHOPE HILL CHILDREN'S HOME: $50,000 · OtherHOPE HILL CHILDREN'S HOMEARC OF WESTCHESTER FOUNDATION: $41,000 · OtherARC OF WESTCHESTER FOUNDATIONSCOTT FINNERAN SCHOLORSHIP FUND: $30,000 · OtherSCOTT FINNERAN SCHOLORSHIP FUNDCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 · OtherCALVARY HOSPITAL INC+14 more: $90,500 · Other+14 morePARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $70,000 · PhilanthropyPARTNERSHIP FO…AHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAHRC NEW YORK …+1 more: $1,500 · PhilanthropyTeach for America Inc: $80,000 · EducationTeach for Am…SUITUP INCORPORATED: $22,500 · EducationSUITUP INCOR…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationBRAVEN INC: $56,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRAVEN INCIMENTOR INC: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INCBROADWAY FOR ALL: $70,000 · Arts & CultureBROADWAY …FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED…OPERATION SMILE INC: $35,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $15,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 · InternationalCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesONE SPIRIT: $8,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOSEPH PARENTING CENTER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTRI-LAKES CARES: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$464,000Philanthropy$121,500Education$103,500Youth Development$101,000Arts & Culture$77,500International$55,000Human Services$45,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeach for America Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY FOR ALL: $70,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR INNER CITY EDUCATION DBA PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVEN INC: $56,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAHRC NEW YORK CITY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIMENTOR INC: $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUITUP INCORPORATED: $22,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNavy League of the united states: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNOURISH BRIDGEPORT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRSHM Life Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetONE SPIRIT: $8,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMMSCHOOLS: $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAROLINE HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH PARENTING CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAIRFIELD CHRISTMAS TREE FESTIVAL: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRATITUDE GLOBAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICA ON TECH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving …Silicon Valley Commun…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…American Endowment Fo…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC12.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert Mize & Isa White Trimble Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert Mize & Isa White Trimble Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Saint Joseph Parenting Center Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Nourish Bridgeport Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert Mize & Isa White Trimble Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home