· Private foundation
The Robert and Michelle Cooke Atchinson Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of THE ROBERT AND MICHELLE COOKE ATCHINSON FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $806k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+4 grants · $4.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR | $2,250,000 |
| WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION | $1,000,000 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $525,020 |
| UPSTREAM | $300,000 |
| CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| NANTUCKET BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $185,000 |
| BIG BROTHER BIG SISTER CENTRAL MASSMETROWEST | $150,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $125,000 |
| THE BOSTON FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| SHARE WINTER FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC | $100,000 |
| THE CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC | $100,000 |
| HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN | $85,000 |
| NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 17% of The Robert and Michelle Cooke Atchinson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RBRon Burton Training Village Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +479%
- CHCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC7× · 2018–2024 · $970k · revenue +263%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MASS /METROWEST INC6× · 2018–2024 · $825k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- OLOUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP MISSION GRAMMAR SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $125k
- UUPSTREAMone grant, 2019 · $100k
- BCBOSTON'S CHILDRENS HOSPITALone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
BCNSP supports the following three pillars of Boston Children's Hospital's four-part mission: (1) providing care to individuals in the community, (2) improving clinical care to its patients, and (3) educating and training clinicians. In…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Massachusetts and Rhode Island Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Bullpen Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
- Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL MASS /METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Share Winter Foundation ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS WONDERFUND INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARANYUNDO INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds SCHOLAR ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Bullpen Project Inc ↗
- Who funds GAVIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · GivenGain Foundation USA · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Edgerley Family Foundation · The Lynch Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Analog Devices Foundation · Boston Bruins Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert and Michelle Cooke Atchinson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Maranyundo Initiative Inc — 85% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Gavin Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Celtics Shamrock Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Friends of the Public Garden Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.