· Private foundation
Hannah M Adler Testamentary Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HANNAH M ADLER CHARITABLE TRUST | $32,840 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TWTHE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2023 · $41k · revenue +16%
- SSSARATOGA SPONSOR-A-SCHOLAR7× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +49%
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC3× · 2019–2022 · $700 · revenue +29%
Funded once
- SCSAM CALBONE ADDICTION MEDICINE PATIENT FUNDone grant, 2022 · $10k
- SSSARATOGA SPRINGS HISTORY MUSEUMone grant, 2017 · $3k
- JHJAKE'S HELP FROM HEAVEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
To provide a comprehensive array of services committed to strengthening, empowering, and educating children, families and the community to reduce the incidence and effects of child abuse, neglect and family dysfunction.
We provide services so that people with disabilities can live, learn, & work in our communities.
Founded in 1963, abbott house builds lasting foundations under children, families, and adults with complex needs. we support nearly 2,500 individuals which includes, children in foster care, unaccompanied immigrant children, adults with…
Rebuilding together saratoga county is dedicated to assisting low-income, elderly, disabled, and other qualifying individual homeowners to rehabilitate their homes so that they can continue to live independently in a warm, dry, safe homes.
The waldorf school of saratoga springs values the healthy development of the whole individual in mind, body, and spirit. through a focus on academics, music, art, and movement, our bountiful curriculum - based on established and evolving…
Homefront's mission is to end homelessness in central new jersey by harnessing the caring, resources, and expertise of the community. we lessen the immediate pain of homelessness and help families become self-sufficient. we work to give…
Housing and programs for sick children and thier families.
Lifebridge's mission is to offer men and women the opportunities they need to end their homelessness. we believe that the way to solve this crisis, one person at a time, is to provide housing with supportive services, to encourage personal…
We offer affordable housing and support programs for homeless and vulnerable new yorkers.
The focus and main program of the Sloatsburg Food Pantry is to provide supplemental food to those in need within the Suffern Central School District (Sloatsburg, Hillburn, Suffern, Montebello, and parts of Airmont) and Tuxedo, NY. We are a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shelters of Saratoga Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sunflower Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE WESLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SARATOGA SPONSOR-A-SCHOLAR ↗
- Who funds ACT WITH RESPECT ALWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JAKE'S HELP FROM HEAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds Dake Foundation for Children ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & RAPE CRISIS SERVICES OF SARATOGA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SUNFLOWER FUND ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BEAGLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERS OF SARATOGA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · The Robert and Lisa Moser Family Foundation Inc · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · The Mitzen Foundation Inc · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · River Farm America Foundation · The Adirondack Trust Company Community Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hannah M Adler Testamentary Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hannah M Adler Testamentary Trust?
Find your warmest path to Hannah M Adler Testamentary Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.