Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert & Christina Silberman Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$281k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$556kEducation$302kArts & Culture$130kCrime & Legal$121kRecreation & Sports$93kEnvironment$28kAnimals$19kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY$100,000
THE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION$26,000
DC BAR PRO BONO PROGRAM$25,000
MK9 SERVICE DOGS$15,000
SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION$13,975
DC PREPATORY ACADEMY$11,000
ELEVATED ACCESS$10,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$10,000
PRO PUBLICA$10,000
EARTH JUSTICE$10,000
A SENSE OF HOME$8,290
COMMON THREADS$7,500
THE LAM FOUNDATION$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A SENSE OF HOME: $8k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$952k · 13 repeat orgs$312k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +69% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$952k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+69%

Still filing today

46%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DC PREPARATORY ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +128%
  • SH
    SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +122%
  • NG
    NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • AF
    AIO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -96%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $8k
  • PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
12
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trust for Public Land; the most unlike its peers is Elevated Access Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
17/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $505,000 · OtherSIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITALDC BAR PRO BONO PROGRAM: $100,000 · OtherDC BAR PRO BONO PROGRAMSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC: $89,335 · OtherSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC+28 more: $138,453 · Other+28 moreSouthern Methodist University: $100,000 · EducationSouthern Methodist Un…DC PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $94,053 · EducationDC PREPARATORY ACADEM…Trustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth…THE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION: $116,300 · Arts & CultureTHE NATIONA…PRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA…COMMON THREADS: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMON THRE…+3 more: $3,800 · Arts & CultureAIO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsGAME CONSERVANCY USA INC: $3,971 · Recreation & SportsNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $8,200 · PhilanthropyThe LAM Foundation: $7,500 · PhilanthropyMK9S SERVICE DOGS: $15,000 · AnimalsChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · Health
Other$832,788Education$244,053Arts & Culture$137,600Recreation & Sports$53,971Philanthropy$15,700Animals$15,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION: $116,300 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDC PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $94,053 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC: $89,335 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAIO FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMK9S SERVICE DOGS: $15,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElevated Access Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA SENSE OF HOME: $8,290 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $8,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON THREADS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe LAM Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $5,133 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGAME CONSERVANCY USA INC: $3,971 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON THE ISLE CORPORATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLAIR HOUSE FOUNDATION: $800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATIONAL THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds DC PREPARATORY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SANKATY HEAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AIO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds MK9S SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Elevated Access Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds A SENSE OF HOME ↗
  • Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
  • Who funds The LAM Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds GAME CONSERVANCY USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds ON THE ISLE CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert & Christina Silberman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert & Christina Silberman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert & Christina Silberman’s filings →

More from the funding graph