Skip to content
The Rita & Harry Greenberger Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rita & Harry Greenberger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$76kAnimals$39kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$15kEnvironment$13kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kHousing & Shelter$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$669k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$3,000
BRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA$3,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$3,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$2,000
KEEP PINELLAS BEAUTIFUL INC$1,500
FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE$1,000
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION$1,000
VECINOS UNIDOS$1,000
THE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION$400
CLARK FAMILY BREAST CANCER SERVICES$100
CONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH COUNTIES$100
WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY$100
OAKS INTEGRATED CARE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DE
TN
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$168k · 35 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
12

Total granted

$168k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+32%

Still filing today

63%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +104%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +62%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • American Diabetes Association
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue -4%
  • SH
    ST HUBERTS ANIMAL WELFARE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • CF
    CHILDREN'S FRESH AIR HOME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue ×19
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Center

The organization, a not-for-profit acute care hospital serving the ocean county region, is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services including…

Health
2
Gettysburg Hospital

Gettysburg hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high quality health care services for the people who live, work, travel through, and vacation in adams county, pennsylvania and northern maryland.

Health
3
Animal Welfare Society of Monroe

The animal welfare society of monroe (awsom) provides shelter and medical care for companion animals so they are free from abuse, hunger, fear and lonliness, until placing them in responsible, forever homes.

Animals
4
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
5
Monmouth Medical Center

To meet the healthcare needs of our community by providing cost-effective quality care. to educate present and future generations of healthcare providers. to provide a continuum of regional tertiary care. please refer to the organization's…

Health
6
The Humane Society of Baltimore County Inc

Provide a temporary home, safe refuge and care for homeless animals. work aggressively to place each animal in a loving, permanent home. strive to end the euthanasia of healthy, adoptable animals by offering affordable spay, neuter and…

Animals
7
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

The mission of robert wood johnson university hospital is to improve the health and well-being of the patients and communities we serve by fostering an environment of excellence in all areas including the provision of the highest quality,…

Health
8
Dorchester Paws

Dorchester Paws strives to instill humane principles into society through the prevention of cruelty to animals.

Animals
9
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
10
Hunterdon Humane Animal Shelter Inc
Animals
11
Waynesboro Hospital

Waynesboro hospital is a regional nonprofit healthcare organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
12
The Humane Society of Rochester & Monroe County for the Prevention of Cruelty to

Together with our community, we better the lives of animals through justice, prevention, and life-saving care. lollypop farm, the humane society of greater rochester, envisions a just and compassionate world for all animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $14,450 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN DIABETES ASSOC RESEARCH FD: $13,000 · OtherAMERICAN DIABETES ASSOC RESEARCH FDSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDAT: $11,900 · OtherSUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATVECINOS UNIDOS: $7,000 · OtherVECINOS UNIDOSBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA: $6,250 · OtherBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCAAMERICAN RED CROSS -HEROES FOR FIRE: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS -HEROES FOR FIREINTERNATIONAL HOMELESS OUTREACH: $4,550 · OtherINTERNATIONAL HOMELESS OUTREACHBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $4,000 · OtherCHESTER RIDLEY CRUM WATERSHEDS ASSOCIATION: $3,800 · Other+17 more: $10,250 · Other+17 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $15,400 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute …THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PH…American Diabetes Association: $7,000 · HealthAmerican Diabetes AssociationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH H…JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $6,000 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC+2 more: $2,100 · HealthMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $24,500 · AnimalsMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCABRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA: $5,000 · AnimalsBRANDYWINE VALLEY SP…Animal Welfare Association Inc: $2,250 · AnimalsAnimal Welfare Assoc…+2 more: $850 · AnimalsKEEP PINELLAS BEAUTIFUL INC: $8,250 · EnvironmentTHE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION: $1,800 · Environment+2 more: $300 · EnvironmentFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $3,150 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $550 · Food & NutritionKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $3,550 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationHistorical Society of Haddonfield: $200 · Arts & CultureHOME PORT ALLIANCE FOR THE USS NEW JERSEY INC: $200 · Arts & Culture
Other$81,200Health$47,000Animals$32,600Environment$10,350Food & Nutrition$3,700Education$3,650Arts & Culture$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA: $24,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $15,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP PINELLAS BEAUTIFUL INC: $8,250 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTER RIDLEY CRUM WATERSHEDS ASSOCIATION: $3,800 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $3,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC: $3,150 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Welfare Association Inc: $2,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN BEACH EMERGENCY FOOD INCORPORATED: $1,700 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTOWNSHIP OF OCEAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM: $1,200 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH INC: $1,100 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $1,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAW WARRIORS INC: $400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational 4-H Council: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES OF OCEAN COUNTY OF NEW JERSEY: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER CORPORATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHistorical Society of Haddonfield: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOME PORT ALLIANCE FOR THE USS NEW JERSEY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPASSAIC RIVER COALITION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONMOUTH COUNTY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds KEEP PINELLAS BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANDYWINE VALLEY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds CHESTER RIDLEY CRUM WATERSHEDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Animal Welfare Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN BEACH EMERGENCY FOOD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds TOWNSHIP OF OCEAN HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CONTACT OF OCEAN AND MONMOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S FRESH AIR HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
  • Who funds PAW WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds National 4-H Council ↗
  • Who funds LEWES IN BLOOM INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES OF OCEAN COUNTY OF NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johns…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rita & Harry Greenberger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rita & Harry Greenberger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Oaks Integrated Care Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Greater Lewes Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rita & Harry Greenberger’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home