Skip to content
The Reinvestment Fund Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Reinvestment Fund Inc

The reinvestment fund, inc.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
170
Grants FY2024still arriving
39
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$28MHuman Services$23MCommunity Improvement$8.0MHousing & Shelter$5.5MHealth$1.5MEducation$743kPhilanthropy$429kEnvironment$410kOther$0
02FY2024 · 170 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 170 grants below total $10,094,481, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,400,106 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $305,625 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k91 grants · $2.3M
  • $50k–250k63 grants · $6.7M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$28,000
Median grant
39
States reached
$698M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELITE CONTRACTORS & HVAC SERVICES LLC$350,000
CHILDREN'S PLAYHOUSE FAIRHILL$325,290
ANN KIDS INC$325,000
QUEEN MOTHER'S MARKET COOPERATIVE$200,000
COUNTY OF DALLAS$200,000
FROG SONG ORGANICS LLC$193,400
MANUELS FOOD MARKET LLC$192,580
LAND & FURROW LLC$188,400
EVA'S VILLAGE INC$180,000
WOOSTER LOCAL FOODS COOPERATIVE$169,700
DIXON COOPERATIVE MARKET$165,616
LITTLE LEARNERS CHILDCARE CENTER LLC$156,007
PARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC$155,000
URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY$155,000
INTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC$155,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KENCREST SERVICES: $54k → 7%INADVANCE: $100k → 10%THE NILES FOUNDATION: $86k → 14%CAPITAL ROOTS INC: $200k → 11%ST JOSEPH CENTER OF ARKANSAS INC: $148k → 17%NATURES GARDEN FOR VICTORY AND PEACE INC: $100k → 32%HOMEFULL: $200k → 14%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $75k → 12%PALESTINIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $51k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $175k → 16%ACTION RESOURCES INTERNATIONAL: $104k → 17%FLIS MARKET LLC: $69k → 14%THE NILES FOUNDATION: $77k → 14%NORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT CORPORATION: $200k → 16%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $30k → 12%LOVE MINISTRIES OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $49k → 12%GILMORE MEMORIAL PRESCHOOL INC: $36k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $155k → 16%EFFLORESCE CULTURE & DESIGN LLC: $148k → 16%TACOMA FARMERS MARKET: $46k → 9%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY INC: $75k → 7%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $100k → 16%THE NILES FOUNDATION: $36k → 14%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY INC: $30k → 7%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $100k → 16%GREATER BERGEN COMMUNITY ACTION: $75k → 7%CHRISTIAN PENTECOSTAL AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAM INC: $35k → 16%KENCREST SERVICES: $313k → 7%KENCREST SERVICES: $123k → 7%CLINTON HILL COMMUNITY & EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $154k → 16%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $155k → 10%GREATER PHILADELPHIA YMCA: $42k → 7%METHODIST SERVICES: $253k → 22%METHODIST FAMILY SERVICES OF PHILADELPHIA: $75k → 22%CARE TO LEARN CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $32k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $34k → 22%DIVERSIFIED COMMUNITY SERVICES: $32k → 22%ASOCIACION PUERTORRIQUENOS EN MARCHA INC: $270k → 22%ASOCIACION PUERTORRIQUENOS EN MARCHA INC: $180k → 22%ASOCIACION PUERTORRIQUENOS EN MARCHA INC: $32k → 22%FEDERATION DAY CARE SERVICES INC: $32k → 22%SPECIAL PEOPLE IN NORTHEAST INC: $32k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $141k → 22%MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES: $49k → 22%PARENT INFANT CENTER: $47k → 22%THE CARING CENTER: $32k → 22%PRECIOUS ANGELS INC: $307k → 22%CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $345k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of The Reinvestment Fund Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Reinvestment Fund Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35M · 214 repeat orgs$33M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

214 repeat relationships: 72 still active in FY2024, 142 since wound down; 97 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

214
515

Total granted

$35M
$27M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+16%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    REBUILD METRO INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $2.5M · revenue +195%
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $599k · revenue +19%
  • PB
    PARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $588k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • MI
    METRO IAF INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2.5M · revenue -61% · 56% of their budget
  • AT
    ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.7M · revenue +335% · 29% of their budget
  • AN
    ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.6M · revenue +136% · 25% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Good City Farm

Common Good City Farm is an urban farm in Washington, DC, where community members source fresh food, see sustainable urban agriculture in action, and learn healthy skills. Our mission is to sustain and support a more equitable community…

Food & Nutrition
2
Dc Greens Inc

DC Greens advances health equity by building a just and resilient food system.

Community Improvement
3
Mill City Farmers Market Inc

Mission: to inspire and nurture a healthy community by building a local, sustainable, and organic food economy in a vibrant experiential marketplace.vision: to be a nationally recognized marketplace model that connects, educates, and…

—
4
Atlantic City Day Nursery

Childcare

Human Services
5
Capital Roots Inc

Capital roots, inc. is a not for profit organization that nourishes healthy communities by providing access to fresh food and green spaces for all. it is our beleif that organic gardening and urban revitilization activites promote self…

Environment
6
Chicago's Green City Market Program

Green city market is securing the future of food by deepening support for sustainable farmers, educating our community, and expanding access to locally-grown food.

Food & Nutrition
7
Sprout City Farms

Sprout city farms collaborates with communities to pursue food justice by cultivating innovative, restorative, and educational farms. sprout city farms envisions a thriving and equitable food system supported by a network of farms and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Coordinated Child Care Inc

To ensure that every child has access to high quality early care and education through integrated support and equitable practices.

Human Services
9
Brooklyn Heights Community Garden

Brooklyn Heights Community Garden cultivates healthy community through growing food, intergenerational learning and creative play.

Community Improvement
10
Sanctuary Farm Phila

Sanctuary Farm seeks to address the health inequities resulting from systemic racial oppression and economic injustice by converting abandoned and neglected areas in our community into spaces that promote safety, hospitality, nutrition and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Farmers Markets Inc

To develop a local food infrastructure for long term sustainability and meaningful community impact and grow a diverse local food culture by maintaining an authentic space for all people to share community, fair food, and healthy…

Food & Nutrition
12
Camden Day Nursery

CHILD CARE SERVICES - The program provides subsidized Day care Services for low income families.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Richmond Memorial Health Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

232 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 232 of the 828 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
58
Early backer (in before they grew)
223/232
Grantees still filing
149/232
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANN KIDS INC: $1,163,838 · Other+131 more: $27,848,144 · Other+131 moreMETRO IAF INC: $2,500,000 · Community ImprovementMETRO IAF INCREBUILD METRO INC: $2,485,890 · Community ImprovementREBUILD METRO INCACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC: $1,687,500 · Community ImprovementACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR …PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $573,918 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN…Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition: $400,000 · Community ImprovementWORKING LANDSCAPES: $358,920 · Community Improvement+12 more: $2,214,371 · Community Improvement+12 moreURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $599,234 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAG…KENCREST SERVICES: $496,645 · Human ServicesKENCREST S…Asociacion De Puertorriquenos en Marcha Inc: $489,000 · Human ServicesAsociacion…METHODIST SERVICES: $355,667 · Human ServicesMETHODIST …Children's Village Inc: $352,000 · Human ServicesChildren's…Precious Angels Inc: $350,451 · Human ServicesPrecious A…INADVANCE: $299,647 · Human ServicesINADVANCEST JOSEPH CENTER OF ARKANSAS INC: $296,143 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH …MERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $223,752 · Human ServicesHOMEFULL: $200,000 · Human ServicesNORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE NILES FOUNDATION: $199,915 · Human ServicesCLINTON HILL COMMUNITY AND EARLY CHILDHO: $167,956 · Human Services+6 more: $675,191 · Human Services+6 moreSPROUT URBAN FARMS INC: $400,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN: $400,000 · Food & NutritionLANCASTER FRESH MARKET INC: $252,138 · Food & NutritionTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $250,000 · Food & NutritionLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER: $250,000 · Food & NutritionARCADIA FOOD INC: $219,158 · Food & NutritionWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $215,400 · Food & NutritionLOCAL FOOD NETWORK: $207,590 · Food & NutritionLOCAL FOOD SOLUTIONS: $200,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT NEW VILLAGE: $200,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD WORKS: $155,775 · Food & NutritionTRI-STATE LOCAL FOODS INC: $150,444 · Food & NutritionURBAN CREATORS: $140,000 · Food & NutritionJEFFERSON GROWERS ARTISANS AND PROD: $125,000 · Food & NutritionCITY SEED INC: $115,837 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $100,030 · Food & NutritionATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,623,500 · Housing & ShelterPARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $588,113 · Housing & ShelterTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC: $200,000 · Housing & ShelterMT VERNON MANOR INC: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterHEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $453,252 · HealthNALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY: $267,191 · HealthKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $265,778 · HealthHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL: $222,000 · HealthCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $146,050 · HealthCORA SERVICES INC: $358,747 · EducationFrenchtown Neighborhood Improvement Association: $223,000 · EducationAFRICAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOLUTIONS: $200,000 · EducationLANDMARK TRAINING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: $152,114 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGE: $127,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $107,000 · Education
Other$29,011,982Community Improvement$10,220,599Human Services$4,905,601Food & Nutrition$3,381,372Housing & Shelter$2,511,613Health$1,354,271Education$1,167,861

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETRO IAF INC: $2,500,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetREBUILD METRO INC: $2,485,890 over 4y, 19% of budgetACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC: $1,687,500 over 1y, 29% of budgetATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,623,500 over 1y, 25% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $599,234 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetPARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC: $588,113 over 4y, 24% of budgetINTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC: $580,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $573,918 over 2y, 42% of budgetKENCREST SERVICES: $496,645 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAsociacion De Puertorriquenos en Marcha Inc: $489,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC: $453,252 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetSPROUT URBAN FARMS INC: $400,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN: $400,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetRainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition: $400,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE FOOD MILL: $395,399 over 3y, 30% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER: $380,950 over 4y, 16% of budgetWORKING LANDSCAPES: $358,920 over 2y, 28% of budgetCORA SERVICES INC: $358,747 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMETHODIST SERVICES: $355,667 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetChildren's Village Inc: $352,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetPrecious Angels Inc: $350,451 over 4y, 28% of budgetSNOWY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT CORP: $327,513 over 2y, 20% of budgetINADVANCE: $299,647 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER OF ARKANSAS INC: $296,143 over 1y, 44% of budgetSUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC ENTERPRISES OF LA DBA FOOD ACCESS LOS ANGELES: $283,233 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetMonte Azul Inc: $275,003 over 3y, 47% of budgetNALWOODI DENZHONE STRENGTH AND BEAUTY COMMUNITY: $267,191 over 2y, 28% of budgetWonderspring: $266,812 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetKOKUA KALIHI VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE FAMILY SERVICES: $265,778 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLANCASTER FRESH MARKET INC: $252,138 over 2y, 21% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $250,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER: $250,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetMOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT: $239,313 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $234,384 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetWhy Not Prosper Inc: $229,225 over 2y, 12% of budgetGREEN BUILDING UNITED: $225,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetMERCY NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES INC: $223,752 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFrenchtown Neighborhood Improvement Association: $223,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetHEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL: $222,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetARCADIA FOOD INC: $219,158 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetWest Virginia Food & Farm Coalition Inc: $215,400 over 2y, 12% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON LOCAVORE: $209,971 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetLOCAL FOOD NETWORK: $207,590 over 2y, 39% of budgetOASIS FRESH FOUNDATIONS: $206,045 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetHOMEFULL: $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLOCAL FOOD SOLUTIONS: $200,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetNORTH FLINT REINVESTMENT: $200,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METRO IAF INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILD METRO INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS TO CAPITAL FOR ENTREPRENEURS INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PARKSIDE BUSINESS & COMMUNITY IN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds KENCREST SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Asociacion De Puertorriquenos en Marcha Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH COALITION OF PASSAIC COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPROUT URBAN FARMS INC ↗
  • Who funds THREE SISTERS KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD MILL ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORKING LANDSCAPES ↗
  • Who funds CORA SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Children's Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds Precious Angels Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONCERN 13 MULTI-PURPOSE LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SNOWY MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater…First UpFair Food Network IncBread and Roses Commu…The William Penn Foun…Low Income Investment…The Patricia Kind Fam…The Philadelphia Foun…Henrietta Tower Wurts…Independence Foundati…Wells Fargo Regional …Union Benevolent Asso…
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA37.4× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · First Up · Fair Food Network Inc · Bread and Roses Community Fund · The William Penn Foundation · Low Income Investment Fund · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Independence Foundation · Wells Fargo Regional Foundation · Union Benevolent Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reinvestment Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reinvestment Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • City Green Inc: 100% of income from government
  • City Seed Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Cooperative Development Institute Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Clinton Hill Community and Early Childho: 22% of income from government
  • Urban League of Essex County: 20% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Bohemia Food Hub: 12% of income from government
  • Interfaith Neighbors Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Rebuild Metro Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 828 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reinvestment’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home