Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Public charity

First Up

We empower and equip early childhood professionals, families, and other adults influential in young children's lives through training, coaching and advocating to positively impact educational and developmental outcomes for young children.

$141k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
1
Itemized grants FY2024
4
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$6k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$6,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$6,000
Organizations funded a year
2 to 10
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$8.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations First Up funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesReligionHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving1$6k100%
FY20234$140k0%
FY20227$82k57%
FY202110$333k90%
FY20202$62kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$618kEmployment$6k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Children's Village Inc$141,00041%
Greater Hope Ministries$105,00027%
Federation Day Care Services D/B/A Federation Early Learning Services$83,50030%
The Caring Center$60,00022%
Highway Mission Tabernacle$42,2501n/a
Wonderspring$41,00020%
Xiente$40,00010%
Korean Community Development Services Center$40,00012%
Children's Playhouse Early Learning$18,0001n/a
The Children's Community School$15,50012%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of First Up by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Children's Village Inc$141,00041%
Greater Hope Ministries$105,00027%
Federation Day Care Services D/B/A Federation Early Learning Services$83,50030%
The Caring Center$60,00022%
Highway Mission Tabernacle$42,2501n/a
Wonderspring$41,00020%
Xiente$40,00010%
Korean Community Development Services Center$40,00012%
Children's Playhouse Early Learning$18,0001n/a
The Children's Community School$15,50012%
Methodist Services$9,00010%
Wescott's Fov Child Care Center$7,0001n/a
Little Pearls Academic Center LLC$5,1001n/a
Beginning Foundation Academy$5,1001n/a
Acclaim Academy$5,1001n/a

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($6k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget First Up supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren's Village Inc: $141,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGreater Hope Ministries: $105,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetFederation Day Care Services D/B/A Federation Early Learning Services: $83,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Caring Center: $60,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWonderspring: $41,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetXiente: $40,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKorean Community Development Services Center: $40,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Children's Community School: $15,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMethodist Services: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Reinvestment Fund IncPA31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Reinvestment Fund Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare First Up with peer funders

About First Up

How much does First Up give?
First Up reported 1 itemized grants totaling $6,000, out of $141,116 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 10 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does First Up fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (99%), Employment (1%).
Who are First Up's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Children's Village Inc ($141k), Greater Hope Ministries ($105k), Federation Day Care Services D/B/A Federation Early Learning Services ($84k).
Does First Up fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as First Up?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Reinvestment Fund Inc, United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey, The Philadelphia Foundation.
Where is First Up based?
First Up is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $60k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on First Up’s filings →

More from the funding graph