Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Reid Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$239kHousing & Shelter$106kEducation$81kHealth$61kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$6kYouth Development$4kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$16k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$20,000
MISSION OF YAHWEH$16,700
CAMPUS CRUSADE$2,600
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$1,500
CHILD ADVOCATES$1,000
HOLLY HALL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY$500
STAR OF HOPE MISSION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER: $5k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $23k → 6%IDRF: $5k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $5k → 10%NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER: $3k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $8k → 6%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $5k → 10%NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER: $3k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $6k → 6%PRIORITY LIVINGORG: $4k → 10%NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER: $3k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $6k → 6%PRIORITY LIVINGORG: $4k → 10%NICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER: $3k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $6k → 6%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $5k → 6%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $3k → 6%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $3k → 6%CAMPUS CRUSADE: $3k → 6%METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $8k → 16%METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $52k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $32k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $30k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $28k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 16%CHRIST EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $14k → 16%CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13k → 16%THE KINKAID SCHOOL: $5k → 16%THE KINKAID SCHOOL: $5k → 16%CHRIST EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $5k → 16%HOPE & HEALING CENTER & INSTITUTE: $3k → 16%HOUSTON FOOD BANK: $2k → 16%NORA'S HOME: $10k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $31k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $21k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $17k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $14k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $5k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $5k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $5k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $4k → 16%MISSION OF YAHWEH: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OH
CA
MD
AR
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$488k · 15 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
18

Total granted

$488k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+16%

Still filing today

53%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MISSION OF YAHWEH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +44%
  • TM
    THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $20k · revenue +92%
  • TK
    The Kinkaid School Inc
    2× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +87%

Funded once

  • NG
    Nora's Gift Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • I
    IDRF
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
City of Hope National Medical Center

City of Hope National Medical Center's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
4
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
5
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

6
Tmh Physician Organization

This organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual…

7
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
8
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
9
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
10
Baptist Health System Foundation Inc

To make hope, healing and well-being accessible to every person as an expression of God's love.

11
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
12
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Methodist Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $218,520 · OtherCHAPELWOOD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHMISSION OF YAHWEH INC — $102,140 · OtherMISSION OF YAHWEH INCCAMPUS CRUSADE — $60,450 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADENICK FINNEGAN COUNSELLING CENTER — $18,200 · OtherCHRIST EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $18,000 · Other+19 more — $45,420 · Other+19 moreTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthNora's Gift Foundation Inc — $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 · HealthThe Kinkaid School Inc — $10,000 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $1,000 · EducationHope and Healing Center & Institute — $4,500 · ReligionNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $3,600 · PhilanthropySTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $3,500 · Housing & ShelterCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$462,730Health$37,500Education$11,000Religion$4,500Philanthropy$3,600Housing & Shelter$3,500Crime & Legal$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSION OF YAHWEH INC — $102,140 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kinkaid School Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNora's Gift Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $6,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope and Healing Center & Institute — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC — $3,600 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION OF YAHWEH INC
  • Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Kinkaid School Inc
  • Who funds Nora's Gift Foundation Inc
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds Hope and Healing Center & Institute
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES INC
  • Who funds SpringSpirit Inc
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Houston Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Medallion Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Reid Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph