Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Regenstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$13MAnimals$7.6MEnvironment$5.0MPhilanthropy$2.9MArts & Culture$1.9MFood & Nutrition$275kEducation$215kPublic Safety & Disaster$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.4M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$77M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHEDD AQUARIUM$1,750,000
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,060,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITY LAB$1,055,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$1,020,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$550,000
LINCOLN PARK ZOO$240,000
GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE$225,000
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$150,000
FIELD MUSEUM$100,000
NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$100,000
NAPLES ZOO$90,000
CHICAGO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY$90,000
LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE$55,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$50,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $50k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 14%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $8k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 33 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$37M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+1%

Still filing today

73%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5.2M · revenue +30%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.9M · revenue +27%
  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AR
    ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S
    one grant, 2024 · $1.1M
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FEDERATION OF
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
3
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
4
The Adler Planetarium

The adler planetarium ('adler') is a not-for-profit cultural institution whose mission is to connect people to the universe and each other under the sky we all share. it aspires to be the world's premier center for engaging in astronomy…

Arts & Culture
5
The Chicago Academy of Sciences

The mission of cas/pnnm is to create a positive relationship between people and nature through collaborations, education, research and collections, exhibits and public forums that foster urban connections to our region's nature and science.

Arts & Culture
6
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
7
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
12
Lincoln Park Conservancy

The mission of the lincoln park conservancy is to preserve and enhance the inspiring beauty of chicago's largest and most visited park for current and future generations. we believe that beauty matters. that it has the transformative power…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Catherine and Channel Lakes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
25/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $5,205,000 · OtherANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S …NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,940,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S: $1,070,000 · OtherANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'STHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $580,000 · Other+28 more: $1,179,000 · Other+28 moreRush University Medical Center: $5,175,000 · HealthRush University Medical CenterRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,860,000 · HealthRehabilitation Institute of Ch…+2 more: $350,000 · HealthLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4,809,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCI…SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $4,300,000 · AnimalsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY+4 more: $523,500 · Animals+4 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,805,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTIC…+5 more: $205,500 · EnvironmentGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC: $1,325,000 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $425,000 · Arts & CultureChicago Symphony Orchestra: $175,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $300,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $150,000 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 · Education
Other$10,974,000Health$10,385,000Animals$9,632,500Environment$5,010,500Arts & Culture$1,950,000Food & Nutrition$300,000Education$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRush University Medical Center: $5,175,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $4,860,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $4,809,000 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,805,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $4,300,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetGULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC: $1,325,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $580,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $425,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $261,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC: $250,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $230,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra: $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $155,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $77,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE: $55,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Arc of Greater New Orleans: $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO: $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Catherine and Channel Lakes: $30,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetConservation Nation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetParliament of the Worlds Religions: $25,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANDERCOOK COLLEGE OF MUSIC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WASTESHED: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Zoological Society ↗
  • Who funds NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MILLENNIUM PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LUMEN CHRISTI INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Greater New Orleans ↗
  • Who funds THE SERVICE CLUB OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Catherine and Channel Lakes ↗
  • Who funds Conservation Nation ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds Parliament of the Worlds Religions ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL13.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Regenstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Regenstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Regenstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Regenstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Regenstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph