· Private foundation
The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUND FAMILY CENTER | $5,000 |
| HAWAI'I WILDLIFE CENTER | $5,000 |
| A TINY HOME FOR GOOD | $5,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO MARIN FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| VERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION | $5,000 |
| CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING | $2,500 |
| CATSNIP HAWAII | $2,500 |
| MILTON FAMILY COMMUNITY CENTER | $2,500 |
| GREATER UTICA COMMUNITY FOOD | $2,500 |
| AMY'S ARMOIRE | $2,500 |
| NORTH KOHALA COMM RESOURCE CTR | $2,500 |
| HAWAII FOOD BANK | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
55 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HWHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER6× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +254%
- TFTHE FOOD BASKET INC7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +157%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- NDNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -13%
- SVSOUTHERN VERMONT NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUMone grant, 2019 · $5k
- LMLOCAL MOTION INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.
Franklin County Humane Society dba Franklin County Animal Rescue (FCAR)promotes the health, welfare, and humane treatment of animal in Northwestern Vermont and provides temporary shelter for them with the goal of finding them good,…
To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.
Operation of Animal Shelter
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
The mission of the Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard is to provide shelter, health care, lover and support to all domestic animals until a permanent home is found for them.
Provide low-cost spay and neuter services to low-income and homeless animals to reduce pet overpopulation.
THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…
To combat hunger on o'ahu by ensuring reliable access to nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.
Willing hands delivers fresh food to more than 80 social service organizations throughout the upper valley of new hampshire and vermont that serve as food access points to our community. fresh food is recovered from local farms, grocery…
We bring our community together through gleaning to recover surplus food produced on area farms to feed those with limited access to nutritious, fresh local food, and in the process help the community to gain a greater awareness and…
Windham County Humane Society is dedicated to ensuring the safety and well being of animals, as well as enhancing the relationship between individuals and pets through adoption, education, advocacy, compassion and promotion of animal…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catsnip Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Friends In Sonoma Helping Inc ↗
- Who funds Lilys Legacy Senior Dog Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Sonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance ↗
- Who funds Lund Family Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds STARTING POINT FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds A TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds WINGS OF RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP AGAPE VERMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Janet Munt Family Room ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BURLINGTON ROTARY CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ARANYA SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
- Who funds ADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOCAL MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds Magical Creatures Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds PACIFIC GATEWAY CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Vermont Foodbank · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Hoehl Family Foundation · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · George W Mergens Foundation · Francis T & Louis T Nichols Foundation · Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Dream Program Inc — 100% of income from government
- Northeast Kingdom Community Action Inc — 82% of income from government
- Kidsafe Collaborative Inc — 76% of income from government
- Steps to End Domestic Violence Inc — 71% of income from government
- Milton Family Community Center Inc — 65% of income from government
- Vermont Kin as Parents Inc — 64% of income from government
- Mentor Vermont Inc — 58% of income from government
- Hope Works Inc — 49% of income from government
- Janet Munt Family Room — 44% of income from government
- Dismas of Vermont Inc — 39% of income from government
- The Family Place Inc — 38% of income from government
- Lund Family Center Inc — 34% of income from government
- Homeshare Vermont Inc — 32% of income from government
- Essex Chips Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Vermont River Conservancy Inc — 21% of income from government
- Local Motion Inc — 19% of income from government
- Food Connects — 15% of income from government
- Green Mountain United Way Inc — 15% of income from government
- Fairfield Community Center Associn — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.