Skip to content
The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp at a glance

· Private foundation

The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$162kAnimals$151kFood & Nutrition$123kEducation$67kYouth Development$40kHousing & Shelter$31kCrime & Legal$27kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUND FAMILY CENTER$5,000
HAWAI'I WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
A TINY HOME FOR GOOD$5,000
SAN FRANCISCO MARIN FOOD BANK$5,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$5,000
VERMONT YOUTH CONSERVATION$5,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$5,000
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING$2,500
CATSNIP HAWAII$2,500
MILTON FAMILY COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
GREATER UTICA COMMUNITY FOOD$2,500
AMY'S ARMOIRE$2,500
NORTH KOHALA COMM RESOURCE CTR$2,500
HAWAII FOOD BANK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 21% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MY NEW RED SHOES: $5k → 7%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $5k → 9%STARTING POINT FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN: $5k → 12%NEUROTALENT WORKS: $3k → 14%ABOTT HOUSE: $5k → 9%BACKYARD HOPE: $3k → 14%READING WEST WINDSOR FOOD SHELF: $1k → 9%CAMP AGAPE VERMONT: $5k → 9%AMY'S ARMOIRE: $3k → 9%NORTHEAST KINGDOM COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $500 → 14%STARTING POINT FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN: $5k → 12%THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE: $5k → 9%READING WEST WINDSOR FOOD SHELF: $1k → 9%CAMP AGAPE VERMONT: $5k → 9%AMY'S ARMOIRE: $3k → 9%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $5k → 9%SHOES THAT FIT: $5k → 14%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $3k → 9%FAIR HAVEN CONCERN: $1k → 12%VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $2k → 9%FRIENDS IN SONOMA HELPING: $3k → 9%CHESTER ANDOVER FAMILY CENTER: $500 → 9%SLATE VALLEY CARES: $500 → 9%CHESTER-ANDOVER FAMILY CENTER INC: $500 → 9%HOMESHARE VERMONT: $2k → 10%SPECTRUM: $5k → 10%THE JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM: $5k → 10%SPECTRUM: $3k → 10%VERMONT KIN AS PARENTS: $3k → 10%THE JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $3k → 10%THE JANET S MUNT FAMILY ROOM: $2k → 10%VERMONT KIN AS PARENTS: $1k → 10%MILTON FAMILY COMMUNITY CENTER: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 55 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
77

Total granted

$459k
$217k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+9%

Still filing today

73%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HW
    HAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER
    6× · 2019–2025 · $30k · revenue +254%
  • TF
    THE FOOD BASKET INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +157%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • ND
    NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -23%
  • SV
    SOUTHERN VERMONT NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • LM
    LOCAL MOTION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Upper Valley Humane Society Inc

UVHS improves quality of life for people and pets through an innovative animal shelter and adoption center and through services that reduce suffering, support wellness, and foster compassion.

Animals
2
Franklin County Humane Society

Franklin County Humane Society dba Franklin County Animal Rescue (FCAR)promotes the health, welfare, and humane treatment of animal in Northwestern Vermont and provides temporary shelter for them with the goal of finding them good,…

Animals
3
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
4
Warwick Valley Humane Society Inc

Operation of Animal Shelter

Animals
5
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
6
Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard Inc

The mission of the Animal Shelter of Marthas Vineyard is to provide shelter, health care, lover and support to all domestic animals until a permanent home is found for them.

Animals
7
Vermont Companion Animal Neutering Inc

Provide low-cost spay and neuter services to low-income and homeless animals to reduce pet overpopulation.

Animals
8
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
9
Feeding Hawaii Together

To combat hunger on o'ahu by ensuring reliable access to nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.

Human Services
10
Willing Hands Enterprises Inc

Willing hands delivers fresh food to more than 80 social service organizations throughout the upper valley of new hampshire and vermont that serve as food access points to our community. fresh food is recovered from local farms, grocery…

Human Services
11
Community Harvest of Central Vermont

We bring our community together through gleaning to recover surplus food produced on area farms to feed those with limited access to nutritious, fresh local food, and in the process help the community to gain a greater awareness and…

Food & Nutrition
12
Windham County Humane Society

Windham County Humane Society is dedicated to ensuring the safety and well being of animals, as well as enhancing the relationship between individuals and pets through adoption, education, advocacy, compassion and promotion of animal…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catsnip Hawaii. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/99
Grantees still filing
64/99
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $22,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANKMAPLE RUN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $15,000 · OtherCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON: $15,000 · Other+93 more: $304,501 · Other+93 moreHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER: $30,000 · AnimalsHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTE…HUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SON…Lilys Legacy Senior Dog Sanctuary: $14,000 · AnimalsLilys Legacy Senior D…MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 · AnimalsMOUNTAIN VIEW FARM AN…WINGS OF RESCUE INC: $10,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INCBIDEAWEE INC: $6,000 · AnimalsADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND: $5,500 · AnimalsMagical Creatures Sanctuary: $5,000 · AnimalsPACIFIC PRIMATE SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsCATSNIP HAWAII: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE RESCUE TRAIN: $5,000 · Animals+12 more: $28,500 · Animals+12 moreFriends In Sonoma Helping Inc: $15,000 · Human ServicesFriends In Sonoma…SPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSPECTRUM YOUTH AN…Lund Family Center Inc: $11,000 · Human ServicesLund Family Cente…STARTING POINT FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTARTING POINT FO…CAMP AGAPE VERMONT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMP AGAPE VERMON…Janet Munt Family Room: $9,500 · Human ServicesJanet Munt Family…ABBOTT HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMBOLDEN CHANGE: $5,000 · Human ServicesAMYS ARMOIRE INC: $5,000 · Human Services+11 more: $20,500 · Human Services+11 moreTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $28,500 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD …REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $15,000 · Food & NutritionREDWOOD E…HAWAII FOODBANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FO…The North End Food Pantry Inc: $4,500 · Food & NutritionThe North…COMMUNITY FOOD CUPBOARD INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionBennington County Meals Program: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition+7 more: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition+7 moreSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance: $12,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationMENTOR Vermont Inc: $5,000 · EducationHEART OF WINOOSKI FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · EducationYOUTH TRANSFORMING JUSTICE: $2,500 · EducationKIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC: $17,000 · Crime & LegalDismas of Vermont Inc: $4,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT HAWAII INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentEssex Chips Inc: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE DREAM PROGRAM INC: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentWindsor County Mentors Inc: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Teen Center Inc: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$357,001Animals$144,000Human Services$113,500Food & Nutrition$64,500Education$27,500Crime & Legal$21,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAII WILDLIFE CENTER: $30,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $28,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $22,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $20,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSAFE COLLABORATIVE INC: $17,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends In Sonoma Helping Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetLilys Legacy Senior Dog Sanctuary: $14,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSPECTRUM YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSonoma Valley Mentoring Alliance: $12,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetLund Family Center Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN VIEW FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetSTARTING POINT FOR REFUGEE CHILDREN: $10,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetA TINY HOME FOR GOOD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP AGAPE VERMONT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetJanet Munt Family Room: $9,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH BURLINGTON ROTARY CHARITIES INC: $8,750 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetARANYA SOLUTIONS: $7,500 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetPROJECT HAWAII INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADDISON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC DBA HOMEWARD BOUND: $5,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL MOTION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMagical Creatures Sanctuary: $5,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPACIFIC GATEWAY CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARA M HOLBROOK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPACIFIC PRIMATE SANCTUARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetABBOTT HOUSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTOR Vermont Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCATSNIP HAWAII: $5,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUE TRAIN: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEssex Chips Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMBOLDEN CHANGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYS ARMOIRE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHAWAII INSTITUTE OF PACIFIC AGRICULTURE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMendocino Vol Fire Dept Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetThe North End Food Pantry Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS VERMONT INC: $4,084 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDismas of Vermont Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER ASSOCIN: $4,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community…Vermont FoodbankNational Life Group C…Hoehl Family Foundati…United Way of Northwe…Agnes M Lindsay TrustCommunity Bank Na Fou…Ben & Jerry's Foundat…Mascoma Bank Foundati…George W Mergens Foun…Francis T & Louis T N…Vermont Childrens Tru…
The Vermont Community FoundationVT58.1× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Vermont Foodbank · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Hoehl Family Foundation · United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Community Bank Na Foundation of New England Inc · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Mascoma Bank Foundation · George W Mergens Foundation · Francis T & Louis T Nichols Foundation · Vermont Childrens Trust Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Redducs Chartered Foundation Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 200%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 39%
  • The Dream Program Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Northeast Kingdom Community Action Inc: 82% of income from government
  • Kidsafe Collaborative Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Steps to End Domestic Violence Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Milton Family Community Center Inc: 65% of income from government
  • Vermont Kin as Parents Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Mentor Vermont Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Hope Works Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Janet Munt Family Room: 44% of income from government
  • Dismas of Vermont Inc: 39% of income from government
  • The Family Place Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Lund Family Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Homeshare Vermont Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Essex Chips Inc: 21% of income from government
  • The Vermont River Conservancy Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Local Motion Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Food Connects: 15% of income from government
  • Green Mountain United Way Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Fairfield Community Center Associn: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
20get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Redducs Chartered’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home