· Private foundation
The Rawley Foundation Xxxxx0008
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k24 grants · $645k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $983k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA OF THE ROCKIES | $1,250,000 |
| TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $850,000 |
| THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION | $700,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN EVERYWHERE | $200,000 |
| GATEWAY COMMUNITY CHURCH | $150,000 |
| THE ROSE | $100,000 |
| THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY INC | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON | $100,000 |
| TEXAS HEARING INSTITUTE | $82,500 |
| HOUSTON FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| ST PAUL CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $50,000 |
| COASTAL PRAIRIE CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| HOUSTON HOSPICE | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $183k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTexas Children's Hospital7× · 2019–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +48%
YMCA OF THE ROCKIES5× · 2019–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +29%
THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH7× · 2019–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +213%
Funded once
- UBUNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $200k
- MCMy Connect Communityone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
- SLSELAH LIFE CHOICES INCone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.
LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.
As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.
Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.
The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.
Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…
Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.
Seeking to put God's love into action, Houston Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to provide a world where everyone has a decent place to live.
Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.
The mission of Collaborative for Children is to meaningfully improve the quality of early childhood education and care for Greater Houston's children through those most influential in their lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loving Houston Inc and the most unlike its peers is Farwide Conservation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Children Everywhere ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
- Who funds APPARO ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ROSE ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Starfish Kenya Inc ↗
- Who funds Memorial Hermann Foundation ↗
- Who funds Halo House Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
- Who funds VITA LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds CHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS-BAY AREA INC ↗
- Who funds Children At Risk ↗
- Who funds Coastal Prairie Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Target Hunger Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR HOPE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Counseling Connections for Change Inc ↗
- Who funds PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds The Blue Bird Circle ↗
- Who funds BakerRipley ↗
- Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds Ft Bend County Child Advocates Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Strake Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Elkins Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Vivian L Smith Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · MD Anderson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rawley Foundation Xxxxx0008 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.