· Private foundation
The Raskin Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER | $12,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $2,000 |
| DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| WALK THE WALK FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| BALTIMORE ABORTION FUND INC | $1,500 |
| ABORTION CARE TENNESSEE | $1,500 |
| JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| NEW VILLAGE ARTS | $1,000 |
| ANNAPOLIS DRAGON BOAT FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| CHLOE AND MAUD FOUNDATION INC | $1,000 |
| THE BERNIE HOUSE | $1,000 |
| JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK | $750 |
| RYMAN ARTS | $750 |
| GLASS ROOTS INC | $500 |
| PILCHUCK GLASS SCHOOL | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +25%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC4× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue ×15- JFJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- VWVISIONARY WOMENgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +122%
- EIENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +120%
- CPCELEBRATION PRODUCTIONS CORPORATIONone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…
To enhance the long-term viability of california agriculture through leadership development, which in turn benefits the people and communities that agriculture serves. we grow leaders who make a difference.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is All for Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE BERNIE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE RYMAN-CARROLL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds RIDERS ALLIANCE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GLASSROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VILLAGE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds ALL FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds WALK THE WALK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Brave Trails ↗
- Who funds ABORTION FUND OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Art Division ↗
- Who funds VISIONARY WOMEN ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BARNSDALL ART PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY ↗
- Who funds BO'S EFFORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Annapolis Dragon Boat Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Anne Arundel Co · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Arundel Community Development Services Inc · The J Paul Getty Trust · Sempra Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Seattle Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Raskin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Glassroots Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.