Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rallis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MEducation$912kArts & Culture$393kReligion$180kYouth Development$128kPublic Safety & Disaster$105kHuman Services$60kRecreation & Sports$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $520k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED: $10k → 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED: $10k → 10%SERVING PEOPLE IN NEED: $10k → 10%RX ART: $105k → 17%RX ART: $75k → 17%RX ART: $65k → 17%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF NEWPORT MESA: $25k → 10%RX ART: $55k → 17%RX ART: $55k → 17%RX ART: $50k → 17%RX ART: $45k → 17%RX ART: $10k → 17%CATERINA'S CLUB: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
IA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 23 repeat orgs$383k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$3.0M
$383k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+36%

Still filing today

65%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    Orange Coast College Foundation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $567k · revenue +87%
  • RA
    RX ART INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $460k · revenue +121%
  • OS
    OPERATION SMILE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • TF
    TCC FAMILY HEALTH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SP
    ST PAULS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES'
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Ucsf Health Medical Foundation

See schedule othe mission of ucsf health medical foundation is threefold: 1) to establish, operate and maintain medical clinics for the provision of healthcare services in california; 2) to promote health by providing, coordinating,…

Health
3
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
4
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
5
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
6
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
12
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Choc Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Michael Fux Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Orange Coast College Foundation: $566,500 · EducationOrange Coast College Foundati…LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $175,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $115,000 · EducationNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY …+2 more: $25,000 · EducationHOAG FAMILY CANCER INSTITUTE: $250,000 · OtherHOAG FAMILY CANCER INSTITUTETCC FAMILY HEALTH: $100,000 · OtherTCC FAMILY HEALTHGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AMERICA: $70,000 · OtherGREEK ORTHODOX ARCHDIOCESE OF AM…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $50,000 · OtherST PAULS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES': $50,000 · OtherORTHODOX CHRISTIAN MISSION CENTER INC: $35,000 · OtherCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · OtherCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC+15 more: $258,000 · Other+15 moreRX ART INC: $460,000 · Human ServicesRX ART INCServing People In Need Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesServing People In…Assistance League of Newport-Mesa: $25,000 · Human Services+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE …ALL STARS PROJECT INC: $97,500 · Arts & CultureALL STARS PROJE…LES BALLETS TROCKADERO DE MONTE CARLO INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureLES BALLETS TRO…OPERATION SMILE INC: $300,000 · InternationalOPERATION …CHOC FOUNDATION: $140,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$881,500Other$958,000Human Services$530,000Arts & Culture$462,500International$300,000Health$150,000Public Safety & Disaster$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOrange Coast College Foundation: $566,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetRX ART INC: $460,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $300,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $290,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $115,000 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $110,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALL STARS PROJECT INC: $97,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLES BALLETS TROCKADERO DE MONTE CARLO INC: $75,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES': $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC: $30,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetServing People In Need Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEWPORT HARBOR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetThe Michael Fux Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDICI FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATERINAS CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCreate Center for the Arts: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Orange Coast College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RX ART INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL STARS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LES BALLETS TROCKADERO DE MONTE CARLO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES' ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND THE INLAND EMPIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Serving People In Need Inc ↗
  • Who funds Assistance League of Newport-Mesa ↗
  • Who funds NMDP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT HARBOR ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Michael Fux Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDICI FOUNDATION A CALIFORNIA PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds UCLA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CATERINAS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Create Center for the Arts ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rallis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rallis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rallis Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rallis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rallis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph