· Private foundation
The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $295k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $535k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY KINGSVILLE | $200,000 |
| CAESAR KLEBERG WILDLIFE RESEARCH | $100,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $85,000 |
| EANES EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| ST IGNATIUS MARTYR CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| LA PENA | $35,000 |
| ST STEPHEN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH TEXAS | $22,500 |
| RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO | $20,000 |
| ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF WOMEN | $15,000 |
| THE TEXAS TRIBUNE | $15,000 |
| CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL | $15,000 |
| KUT RADIO | $15,000 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| CAPITAL AREA PARKINSON'S SOCIETY | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $136k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 54 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $385k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FCFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC7× · 2017–2023 · $193k · revenue +99%
Central Texas Food Bank Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $128k · revenue +12%- KTKIPP Texas Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +756%
Funded once
- HRHUMANITARIAN RESPITE CENTERone grant, 2019 · $50k
- BOBOARD OF TRUSTEES STANFORDone grant, 2021 · $38k
- PAPORT ARANSAS PRESERVATION FUNDone grant, 2020 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…
Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…
Texas water foundation is a statewide nonprofit that provides educational resources and educational services on water in texas for decision makers, water professionals, and everyday texans. texas water foundation works in the areas of…
Support and strengthen austin public libraries
A community-based organization that develops leadership of workers to construct a movement of worker families in the texas borderlands.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County and the most unlike its peers is Port Aransas Conservancy Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds KIPP Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds The Ann Richards School Foundation ↗
- Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Eanes Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds EMANCIPET INC ↗
- Who funds International Media Project ↗
- Who funds BLUE LAPIS LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds ASAPROSAR DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Todos Juntos Learning Center ↗
- Who funds Infact DBA Corporate Accountability ↗
- Who funds CONSPIRARE INC ↗
- Who funds Child Legacy International Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN YMBL SUNSHINE CAMP ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARYS HALL INC ↗
- Who funds Front Steps Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Texas Foundation for Conservation ↗
- Who funds PORT ARANSAS CONSERVANCY FUND ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Shield-Ayres Foundation · The Moody Foundation · St David's Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · James R Dougherty Jr Foundation Inc · United Way for Greater Austin · Donald D Hammill Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.