Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Potter's Clay Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$455kHousing & Shelter$315kHuman Services$288kFood & Nutrition$225kCrime & Legal$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kReligion$10k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$30,000
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$30,000
GREATER CHIC FOOD$25,000
HOWARD BROWN HEALTH CENTER$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$25,000
OPEN COMMUNITIES$10,000
OPENING DOORS$10,000
GRAND AVENUE CLUB$10,000
KINSHIP COMMUNITY FOOR CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $50k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $3k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $3k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $3k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $3k → 14%MCGAW YMCA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +64% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$1.3M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
0%

Still filing today

82%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE NIGHT MINISTRY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +11%
  • HB
    Howard Brown Health Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +169%
  • CF
    CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +370%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF NEW VIENNA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • OD
    OPEN DOORS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness

Chicago Coalition to End Homelessness (CCH) builds community power and advances racial equity through organizing, advocacy, legal assistance, and education to prevent and end homelessness because housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
3
Community Health Partnership of Illinois

Strive to improve the health and well being of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and other medically vulnerable populations by providing quality accessable, affordable, and culturally responsive health care within the community we serve.

Health
4
Live Free Chicago

Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…

—
5
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
6
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
7
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
8
The Affordable Housing Corporation of Lake County

To provide decent, safe and sanitary housing that is affordable to low and moderate-income persons and to stabilize and strengthen communities by improving the local housing stock. the corporation shall administer programs that revitalize…

Human Services
9
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
10
Respond Now

Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.

Human Services
11
Northern Illinois Blood Bank Inc D/B/a Rock River Valley Blood Center

Rock river valley blood center, in partnership with our community, is dedicated to providing safe, high value blood products and services to people in need.

Health
12
Illinois Presbyterian Home

Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Young Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Howard Brown Health Center: $210,000 · OtherHoward Brown Health CenterGREATER CHIC FOOD: $125,000 · OtherGREATER CHIC FOODPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $125,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODOPENING DOORS: $90,000 · OtherOPENING DOORSCITY OF NEW VIENNA: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $25,000 · OtherTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $275,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYYoung Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc: $12,500 · Human ServicesCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $205,000 · Housing & ShelterCONNECTIONS FOR TH…OPEN COMMUNITIES: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterOPEN COMMUNITIESPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $100,000 · HealthDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $10,000 · HealthGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $95,000 · Food & NutritionCHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND: $70,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$600,000Human Services$287,500Housing & Shelter$225,000Health$110,000Food & Nutrition$95,000Crime & Legal$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $275,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHoward Brown Health Center: $210,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $205,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $95,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPENING DOORS: $90,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND: $70,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetOPEN COMMUNITIES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGRAND AVENUE CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Howard Brown Health Center ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds OPENING DOORS ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND ↗
  • Who funds OPEN COMMUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Assoc McGaw Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND AVENUE CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Potter's Clay Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Potter's Clay Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Potter's Clay’s filings →

    More from the funding graph