Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Pine Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$998kEnvironment$843kYouth Development$650kFood & Nutrition$434kEducation$175kHuman Services$125kReligion$72kHealth$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS BOOK FESTIVAL$100,000
BUGGY BARN MUSEUM$30,000
JOHNSON CITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$20,000
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$7,000
THE JAMES DICK FOUNDATION$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE HOMELESS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $212k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $55k → 8%BLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $40k → 8%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 10%BLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $10k → 8%BLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 8 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
13

Total granted

$2.9M
$463k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+21%

Still filing today

88%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Taking Care of Texas
    5× · 2017–2021 · $840k · revenue +727% · 39% of their budget
  • TB
    Texas Book Festival
    8× · 2017–2024 · $750k · revenue +90%
  • AE
    AUSTIN EXPLORE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $650k · revenue +375%

Funded once

  • KT
    KIPP TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2023 · $125k
  • HH
    HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -1%
  • AR
    AUSTIN RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $55k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

2
Big Thicket Natural Heritage Trust

We acquire properties to be donated to the National Park Service and state entities and advocate for protection of Big Thicket natural resources.

Environment
3
Texas Flying Legends Museum
4
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
6
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
7
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
8
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
9
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
10
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
12
Center for 20TH Century Texas Studies

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bamberger Ranch Preserve. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Taking Care of Texas — $840,000 · EnvironmentTaking Care of TexasTexas Book Festival — $750,000 · Recreation & SportsTexas Book FestivalAUSTIN EXPLORE INC — $650,000 · EducationAUSTIN EXPLORE INCKIPP Texas Inc — $50,000 · EducationKIPP Texas IncKIPP TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $125,000 · OtherKIPP TEXAS PUBL…CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK — $115,000 · OtherCAPITAL AREA FO…LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY — $50,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA & LYMP…FOUNDATION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $30,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR …SALVATION ARMY — $25,000 · OtherAUSTIN RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC — $55,000 · OtherAUSTIN RESTORAT…PRIMARILY PRIMATES INC — $20,000 · OtherJOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT — $20,000 · Other+7 more — $45,000 · Other+7 moreBUGGY BARN MUSEUM — $238,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureBLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC — $112,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $207,000 · Food & Nutrition
Environment$840,000Recreation & Sports$750,000Education$700,000Other$485,000Arts & Culture$243,000Human Services$212,000Food & Nutrition$207,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTaking Care of Texas — $840,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetTexas Book Festival — $750,000 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetAUSTIN EXPLORE INC — $650,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetBUGGY BARN MUSEUM — $238,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $207,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC — $112,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAUSTIN RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC — $55,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPRIMARILY PRIMATES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT — $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetBamberger Ranch Preserve — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORWOOD PARK FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetJames Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Taking Care of Texas
  • Who funds Texas Book Festival
  • Who funds AUSTIN EXPLORE INC
  • Who funds BUGGY BARN MUSEUM
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds BLANCO GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds KIPP Texas Inc
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
  • Who funds PRIMARILY PRIMATES INC
  • Who funds JOHNSON CITY VOL FIRE DEPT
  • Who funds SACRED HEART RADIO INC
  • Who funds Bamberger Ranch Preserve
  • Who funds NORWOOD PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Still Water Foundation · The Moody Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Pine Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Pine Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Pine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph