· Private foundation
The Philip & Barbara Long Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of THE PHILIP & BARBARA LONG FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TIDAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| CHILD & FAMILY FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| ASBURY CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $9,000 |
| APPALACHIAN SERVICE PROJECT | $5,500 |
| ONE YEAR TO EMPOWERMENT | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUND OF EASTERN SHORE | $2,000 |
| LIFE CRISIS CENTER | $2,000 |
| ST FRANCIS DE SALES CHURCHSCHOOL | $1,750 |
| FALCONS YOUTH SPORTS | $1,600 |
| COASTAL HOSPICE | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $1,500 |
| VILLAGE OF HOPE | $1,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| HORIZONS SALISBURY | $1,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN HOSPICE OF NEW MEXICO | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTIDALHEALTH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2023–2025 · $101k · revenue +107%
- E2ELEVEN 21 INC5× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +91%
- HDHORIZONS DELMARVA INC6× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- AASAone grant, 2018 · $20k
- PFPRMC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $18k
- JHJOHNS HOPKINS UNIV GI INNOVATIVE FDone grant, 2019 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Calverthealth medical center provides quality inpatient and ambulatory health care to the people of southern maryland that is accessible, cost-effective and compassionate. chmc works in partnership with the community to improve the health…
Children's health foundation (chf) supports children's health system (chs) and children's hospital of the king's daughters (chkd). chf is organized and operated to carry out the charitable, educational and scientific purposes of chs and…
To support hospice of the chesapeake, inc., hospice of charles county, calvert hospice in their mission to improve the quality of life for those in our communities experiencing advanced illness or bereavement through hospice, palliative…
Our communities expect and deserve superior medical treatment, compassionate care, and expert guidance in maintaining their health and well-being. at carroll hospital center, we offer an uncompromising commitment to the highest quality…
Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.
To provide physician services to patients of the university of maryland upper chesapeake health system.
To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.
The mission of chesapeake charities, inc. is to provide innovative leadership and quality services that encourage charitable giving, build community resources, and enable donors continued on schedule o
The mission of upmc western maryland is to serve our community by providing outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health system through clinical & technological innovation, research and education.
Chester river health foundation's (crhf) mission is to raise funds that steward and enhance healthcare excellence for the people who live in or visit the communities served by chester river hospital center, inc. (dba um shore medical…
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
To provide excellence in the delivery of healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor and the most unlike its peers is Stripers Forever Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIDALHEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ELEVEN 21 INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS DELMARVA INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILD AND FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE HOUSING MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SHELTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FRUITLAND COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TIDALHEALTH PENINSULA REGIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds LOWER SHORE SUPPORT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Eastern Shor · Franklin P and Arthur W Perdue Foundation Inc · Richard a Henson Foundation Inc · United Way of the Lower Eastern Shore Inc · Salisbury Wicomico Economic Development Inc · Jack P and Anne R Smith Foundation · Humphreys Foundation Inc · Donnie Williams Foundation Inc · Joan W Jenkins Foundation Inc · Jack Burbage Foundation Inc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Philip & Barbara Long Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Life Crisis Center Inc — 24% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Salisbury University Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Tidalhealth Peninsula Regional Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.