Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pfeifer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Pfeifer Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Pfeifer Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $68k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

1
’17
0
’18
0
’19
9
’20
16
’21
13
’22
12
’23
13
’24
5
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.1MEducation$315kEnvironment$160kHuman Services$130kEmployment$70kCrime & Legal$60kHealth$43kInternational$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND$10,000
GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT$10,000
EARTH JUSTICE$5,000
FII NATIONAL$5,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$5,000
NRDC$5,000
MATH ACTION$5,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIESORG$5,000
WAWC HEALTH CARE$3,000
PETEN HEALTH$3,000
BARAKA GIRLS$3,000
INTERNATIONAL PEACE INITIATIVE$3,000
MARIN FOOD BANK$2,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$2,000
REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $10k → 11%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $10k → 11%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $10k → 11%FII NATIONAL: $20k → 10%FII NATIONAL: $20k → 10%GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $10k → 11%FII NATIONAL: $20k → 10%FII NATIONAL: $10k → 10%FII NATIONAL: $5k → 10%FII NATIONAL: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$848k · 16 repeat orgs$441k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$848k
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthEducationEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +26%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +16%
  • GV
    GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +36%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • UO
    U OF A SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
4
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
7
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
A Well-Fed World

A Well-Fed World is a plant-based hunger relief and climate advocacy organization. We nourish people in need strengthen global food security and promote plant-based feeding and farming solutions that uplift marginalized communities and…

Food & Nutrition
10
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
11
Rainforest Action Network

Rainforest Action Network (RAN) works toward a world where the rights and dignity of all communities are respected and where healthy forests, a stable climate and wild biodiversity are protected and celebrated.

Environment
12
Impact Oakland Now
Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fii - National; the most unlike its peers is International Peace Initiatives. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $793,607 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropySCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $320,000 · OtherSCHWAB CHARITABLE FUNDHOMEBOY INDUSTRIESORG: $70,000 · OtherHOMEBOY INDUSTRIESORGIndividual grant recipient: $50,210 · OtherIndividual grant recipientU OF A SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherOakland Community Land Trust: $25,000 · Other+16 more: $119,200 · Other+16 moreOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIV…MATHACTION: $40,000 · EducationMATHACTIONNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $60,000 · EnvironmentFII - NATIONAL: $80,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $40,000 · Human ServicesNo One Left Behind: $10,000 · Human ServicesEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $60,000 · Civil RightsRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE: $10,000 · Civil RightsPETEN HEALTH: $15,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL PEACE INITIATIVES: $15,000 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,175 · International
Philanthropy$793,857Other$609,410Education$290,000Environment$160,000Human Services$130,000Civil Rights$70,000International$32,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $793,607 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFII - NATIONAL: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMATHACTION: $40,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetGLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT: $40,000 over 4y, 7.0% of budgetOakland Community Land Trust: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPETEN HEALTH: $15,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PEACE INITIATIVES: $15,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetAbortion Fund of Ohio: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNo One Left Behind: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Women's Health Network: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $2,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds MATHACTION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL VILLAGE CONNECT ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Community Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds PETEN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL PEACE INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds Abortion Fund of Ohio ↗
  • Who funds No One Left Behind ↗
  • Who funds National Women's Health Network ↗
  • Who funds RELIGIOUS COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pfeifer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pfeifer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Pfeifer Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Pfeifer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pfeifer Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph