Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$533k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$640kHuman Services$453kPublic Benefit$375kArts & Culture$275kSocial Science$275kCivil Rights$50kYouth Development$43kEmployment$32k
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $142k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $376k
$16,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE$111,000
AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST$100,000
THE POLICY CIRCLE$65,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - GRAHAM SCHOOL$50,000
CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES$50,000
JACK MILLER CENTER$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION$25,000
CHRISTOPHER HOUSE$25,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL - BALTIMORE$16,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - BALTIMORE COUNCIL$10,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY - CENTER FOR ENLIGHTENED DISAGREEMENT$10,000
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL - CHICAGO$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF FLORDIA FDTN - HAMILTON SCHOOL$10,000
UPWARDLY GLOBAL$10,000
ICIVICS$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $828k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $90k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $50k → 14%christopher house: $50k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%center for urban families: $80k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $58k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 19 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$2.6M
$8k

Still filing today

63%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesSocial ScienceArts & CulturePublic BenefitCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $488k · revenue +70%
  • AE
    AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $386k · revenue +9%
  • AB
    American Battlefield Trust
    5× · 2020–2025 · $375k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIVING CLASSROOMS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HA
    HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT OF BALTIMORE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
11
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Iowa

The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…

Civil Rights
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Digital Harbor Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $487,500 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INCCHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $340,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTOPHER HOUSEAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $386,000 · Social ScienceAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUT…THE POLICY CIRCLE CO: $290,000 · Social ScienceTHE POLICY CIRCLE COAmerican Battlefield Trust: $375,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Battle…UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO - GRAHAM SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF…CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL - BALTIMORE: $48,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JE…CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JE…JACK MILLER CENTER: $40,000 · OtherJACK MILLER C…CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL - CHICAGO: $35,000 · OtherCRISTO REY JE…BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - BALTIMORE COUNCIL: $30,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF…BALTIMORE AREA COUNCIL BOYS SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $22,500 · OtherBALTIMORE ARE…+5 more: $30,064 · Other+5 moreENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY: $85,000 · EducationENOCH PRA…DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $57,500 · EducationDIGITAL H…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR URBAN DEBATE LEAGUES: $45,000 · EducationNATIONAL …BALTIMORE URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $30,000 · EducationBALTIMORE…ICIVICS INC: $7,500 · EducationStand Together Foundation: $150,000 · Public BenefitFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $75,000 · Civil RightsUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $20,000 · Employment
Human Services$827,500Social Science$676,000Arts & Culture$375,000Other$325,564Education$225,000Public Benefit$150,000Civil Rights$75,000Employment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $487,500 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $386,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust: $375,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $340,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE POLICY CIRCLE CO: $290,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetStand Together Foundation: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR URBAN DEBATE LEAGUES: $45,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBALTIMORE URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetICIVICS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds American Battlefield Trust ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE POLICY CIRCLE CO ↗
  • Who funds Stand Together Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL HARBOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR URBAN DEBATE LEAGUES ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARDLY GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds ICIVICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 36%
  • Center for Urban Families Inc: 36% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peter Bowe and Barbara Stewart’s filings →

More from the funding graph