Does The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Royce Family Fund Inc, Chelsea Groton Foundation, Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation.

The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees

The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees at a glance

· Private foundation

The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees

Q: What does The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (21%), Health (20%), International (12%).

Q: Who are The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: The Westerly Hospital Foundation Inc ($83k), The Watch Hill Conservancy ($70k), Citizens Housing & Planning Council of N ($43k).

Q: Does The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 2% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$172k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$15k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$260kHealth$250kInternational$152kAnimals$143kEnvironment$116kHousing & Shelter$72kHuman Services$59kRecreation & Sports$52kOther$0

02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k43 grants · $122k
$10k–50k4 grants · $50k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$5.5M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
THE WESTERLY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION	$15,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC	$15,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER	$10,000
WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY	$10,000
CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL	$7,500
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART	$5,000
THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER	$5,000
WNET	$5,000
SESAME WORKSHOP	$5,000
THE HUNTINGTON THEATRE	$5,000
AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION	$5,000
THE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER	$5,000
THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART	$5,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES	$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC	$5,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$1.1M · 61 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

61 repeat relationships: 46 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.1M

$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+55%

Still filing today

69%

50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureAnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TW
THE WATCH HILL CONSERVANCY
8× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +144%
CH
CITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N
5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +5%
CP
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +76%

Funded once

UU
UNICEF USA
one grant, 2018 · $80k
FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +361%
OC
OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATER
one grant, 2020 · $18k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals

Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture

Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech

American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture

Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture

New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture

National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture

The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Park Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

50/52

Grantees still filing

36/52

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$552,600Arts & Culture$203,500Health$142,500Animals$131,000Environment$105,000Human Services$60,000Recreation & Sports$52,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Royce Family Fund IncCT26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Royce Family Fund Inc · Chelsea Groton Foundation · Forrest C & Frances H Lattner Foundation · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · AM Roberts Charitable Foundation · Ashaway Charitable Trust · Lynch Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Eugene A & Suzanne H Gorab Foundation · The Ninigret Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees?

Find your warmest path to The Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Peter and Deborah Lamm Foundation R Bradford Malt Et Al Trustees’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home