· Private foundation
Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k109 grants · $252k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $469k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND | $61,000 |
| Town of Westerly | $50,000 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION | $40,000 |
| COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF RHODE ISLAND | $30,000 |
| RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $28,700 |
| CITY OF CENTRAL FALLS | $25,000 |
| SWAP STOP WASTING ABANDOND PROPERTIES | $20,000 |
| OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA | $20,000 |
| TRINITY TABERNACLE | $20,000 |
| OLNEYVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| TOWER STREET CENTER INC | $20,000 |
| OLNEYVILLE HOUSING CORP | $20,000 |
| PAWTUCKET CENTRAL FALLS DEVELOPMENT | $20,000 |
| THE WOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT | $20,000 |
| WEST ELMWOOD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $912k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
169 repeat relationships — 91 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA9× · 2017–2025 · $638k · revenue +31%
SAN MIGUEL EDUCATION CENTER6× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +122%
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION6× · 2019–2025 · $118k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- TSTHE STATION FIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $55k · revenue -94%
- SRST RAPHAEL ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · $25k
- WLWESTERLY LIBRARY AND WILCOXone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to eliminate health disparities in rhode island and beyond. the organization develops innovative public health programs, conducts translational and policy research, provides clinical services, and trains…
Preservation of affordable housing in the state of rhode island
Rhode Island Developmental Disabilities Council's mission is to promote changes wthin communities in Rhode Island that encourages, inspires and makes possible for individuals with disabilities to create, pursue and achieve lives that are…
To be a proactive advocate for the hospitals in rhode island that is capable of working for and with the hospitals to positively influence public opinion, legislative outcomes and regulatory policy. the purpose of such advocacy is to…
Advancement of fiscally responsible government, competitive tax policies, and economic opportunities for all in rhode island by providing objective and nonpartisan research and analysis.
The university of rhode island alumni association informs and engages current and future alumni as committed partners of the university, its missions and traditions.
Promoting a more equitable, economically vibrant, and environmentally sustainable food system in rhode island.
Roger williams medical center's mission is to provide healthcare services in providence, rhode island and surrounding communities.
The mission of rhode island health care association is to enhance its members' ability to provide sustainable quality health care and quality of life to the residents of rhode island's skilled nursing facilities.as a state affiliate of the…
To represent the interests of municipal officials and to provide them services which enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of city and town services through technical assistance, information sharing and training.
To assist rhode islanders with differing abilities in their efforts to achieve full inclusion in society and to exercise their civil and human rights through the provision of legal advocacy.
The parent support network of ri is a group of parents, family members, transition age youth, and adults with behavioral health lived experience who are committed to supporting and assisting peers and working with statewide and national…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Economic Progress Institute and the most unlike its peers is The Colonial Theatre School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
219 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 219 of the 364 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCEAN COMMUNITY YMCA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THE OCEAN COMMUNITY UNITED THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds SAN MIGUEL EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OLNEYVILLE HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PAWTUCKET CENTRAL FALLS DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds AMOS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds WEST ELMWOOD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds THE STATION FIRE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S FRIEND AND SERVICE ↗
- Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN COMMUNITY CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Blackstone Valley Community Health Care Inc ↗
- Who funds ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOR ALL INC ↗
- Who funds SALVE REGINA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WOONSOCKET NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Always Learning Rhode Island ↗
- Who funds SWAP INC (STOP WASTING ABANDONED PROPERTY) ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds OLNEYVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MCAULEY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WESTERLY AREA REST MEALS (WARM) INC ↗
- Who funds WOOD RIVER HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · The Champlin Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · Amica Companies Foundation · The Beacon Foundation · Ida Ballou Littlefield Memorial Trust · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Harborone Foundation Rhode Island · Citizens Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New London Homeless Hospitality Center — 47% of income from government
- Women's Business Development Council Inc — 39% of income from government
- Christian Community Action Inc — 29% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Avalonia Land Conservancy Inc — 21% of income from government
- Dr Martin Luther King Scholarship Fund — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- New Haven Symphony Orchestra Inc — 3% of income from government
- Needham Community Council Inc — 2% of income from government
- Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lawyers for Civil Rights Inc — 1% of income from government
- New Haven Promise Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.