Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Peszynski Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$386kHuman Services$379kEducation$367kRecreation & Sports$60kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$20kPhilanthropy$10kHealth$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $175k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SALVATION ARMY$30,000
ST FRANCIS XAVIER A JESUIT PARISH$25,000
CHRISTO REY SACRAMENTO HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$20,000
ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA PARISH$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$15,000
CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$15,000
SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
ST JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE$10,000
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 4970$10,000
JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL COMMUNITY OF SACRAMENTO$5,000
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL$5,000
MOLLY'S ANGELS OF NAPA VALLEY$5,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA$5,000
ROOTS YOUNG ADULT CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY: $10k → 15%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $3k → 11%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY: $10k → 15%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY: $10k → 15%COMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $1k → 9%WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $5k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDRENS HOME: $5k → 12%SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 12%ST JOHNS PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%STJOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%STJOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $10k → 12%STJOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OR
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 23% of The Peszynski Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 56%.

The Peszynski Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 20 repeat orgs$262k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
22

Total granted

$1.0M
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+12%

Still filing today

35%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $150k · revenue +28%
  • CP
    CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $75k · revenue +42%
  • SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA
    one grant, 2021 · $55k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY DEL ORO DIVISION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services
2
Seattle Children's Guild Association

Seattle children's guild association advocates for seattle children's hospital through volunteer, philanthropic and community endeavors to ensure hope, excellent care and advanced cures for children.

—
3
The Waverly School

The waverly school is a nonsectarian, coeducational, college preparatory progressive day school that spans preschool through high school. it is fully accredited by the western association of school and colleges and the california…

Education
4
Southern California Public Radio

The mission of southern california public radio is to strengthen the civic and cultural bonds that unite southern california's diverse communities by providing the highest quality news and information across multiple platforms. we are a…

Arts & Culture
5
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
6
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
Sutter Health

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
10
California State University Alumni Association

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education
11
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
12
Extraordinary Home Care Dba St Marys Home Care

A certified home health agency (chha) providing home-based therapy and related rehabilitation services to children and young adults with special needs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Robert Louis Stevenson School; the most unlike its peers is Special Books by Special Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA PARISH: $225,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS LOYOLA PARISHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $135,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL: $90,000 · OtherCRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOLSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST IGNATIUS LOYOLA: $55,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST IGNATIUS LOYOLAKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL 4970: $45,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $40,000 · Other+22 more: $286,000 · Other+22 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHIN…CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHN…+3 more: $12,000 · EducationSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $65,000 · Human ServicesSAINT JOHN'…ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT …SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $30,000 · Human ServicesSACRAMENTO …WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN STATE GOLF TOUR ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMeals on Wheels by ACC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$876,000Education$237,000Human Services$134,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Youth Development$20,000Health$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE: $65,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE GOLF TOUR ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels by ACC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Books by Special Kids Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF NAPA VALLEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S PROGRAM FOR REAL CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE GOLF TOUR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Loyola Guild of Jesuit High School ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way California Capital RegionCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way California Capital Region · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Peszynski Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Peszynski Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • St Vincent De Paul Society of Lane County Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Peszynski’s filings →

More from the funding graph