Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$256k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$685kAnimals$418kInternational$201kHuman Services$133kCrime & Legal$81kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kCommunity Improvement$55kEmployment$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION$87,900
SUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION$25,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER$15,000
CHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING$15,000
ALBEMARLE HOPELINE$13,000
EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE$12,500
A CHILD FOR ALL (ACFA)$12,000
GUADALUPE CENTER$10,000
PANGEA NETWORK$10,000
WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MASSAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND (MGEF)$10,000
SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA$6,000
NAPILI KAI FOUNDATION$5,000
FOSTERING SUCCESS$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%THE CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $5k → 8%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER: $5k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 11%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 33 repeat orgs$318k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
23

Total granted

$1.5M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+5%

Still filing today

55%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $76k · revenue +285%
  • AH
    ALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $61k · revenue +32%
  • GC
    Guadalupe Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • SO
    SUNY ONEONTA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • SO
    SUNNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kauai Spca

To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.

Animals
2
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
3
Hawaii Pet Network Inc

The organization rescues unwanted, injured, and neglected animals and rehomes them into forever homes. the organization promotes the benefits or spaying & neutering pets, educates the community about the humane treatment of animals, and is…

4
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
5
Advocates 4 Animals Pet Food Pantry

Advocates 4 Animals A4A Pet Pantry is a 100% volunteer 501c3 nonprofit dedicated to keeping animals with their families during financial hardship by providing pet food and spay-neuter assistance. We also operate an adoption program caring…

Animals
6
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
7
Lovebugs Rescue

Lovebugs rescue is a foster-based animal rescue located in southern california. we began our mission in october 2010 and focus on rescuing dogs from high kill shelters and neglect. we rescue all breeds and all ages. we provide all medical…

Animals
8
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
9
Caloosa Humane Society Inc

The mission of Caloosa Humane Society is to serve, shelter, and protect the homeless pets in our care. We are dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive homes for our companion animals in need. Our no-kill facility provides low…

Education
10
Second Chance Pet Adoptions Inc

To champion homeless cats and dogs who are healthy or treatable in the quest to find their forever homes and engage with our community to provide responsible pet ownership reducing future generations of homeless animals.

Animals
11
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
12
Home Fur Good Animal Rescue and Placement

To eliminate euthanasia of treatable, adoptable dogs and cats in maricopa county through adoption, medical care, promotion of spay & neuter and owner education. hfg also operates a low-cost vaccine/microchip clinic each week to provide…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everglades Angels Dog Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fostering Success Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Child and Family ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceNative Hawaiian Community D…Christian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SUNY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherSUNY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA FOUNDATIONSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATION — $125,000 · OtherSUNY ONEONTA FOUNDATIONCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNING — $90,000 · OtherCHAMPIONS FOR LEARNINGCOLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATION — $87,900 · OtherCOLLEGE OF ALBEMARLE FOUNDATIONDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER — $83,000 · OtherDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC — $61,000 · Other+35 more — $480,217 · Other+35 moreEVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC — $76,100 · AnimalsEVERGLADES ANGE…SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA — $58,800 · AnimalsSPCA OF NORTHEA…HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $43,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY …OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $40,000 · AnimalsOUR COMPANIONS …MUTTVILLE — $25,000 · AnimalsMUTTVILLE+1 more — $2,500 · AnimalsGuadalupe Center Inc — $60,000 · Human ServicesGuadalupe…THE PANGEA NETWORK — $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE PANGE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican …DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC …THE CAROLINAS FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE AND HOME CARE — $5,000 · Human ServicesNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION — $41,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT — $50,000 · EmploymentLASTING FRIENDS INC — $45,000 · InternationalKIVA MICROFUNDS — $2,000 · InternationalBEADS FOR EDUCATION INC — $31,500 · Education
Other$1,207,117Animals$245,400Human Services$145,000Arts & Culture$51,000Employment$50,000International$47,000Education$31,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC — $76,100 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC — $61,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA — $58,800 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetWOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT — $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLASTING FRIENDS INC — $45,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetTHE PANGEA NETWORK — $45,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY — $43,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION — $41,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetOUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBEADS FOR EDUCATION INC — $31,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCHILD'S PATH INC — $30,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetAKOLA PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMUTTVILLE — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAROLINAS FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE AND HOME CARE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIVA MICROFUNDS — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNaples Therapeutic Riding Center Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVERGLADES ANGELS DOG RESCUE INC
  • Who funds ALBEMARLE HOPELINE INC
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc
  • Who funds SPCA OF NORTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT
  • Who funds LASTING FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds THE PANGEA NETWORK
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds NAPILI KAI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OUR COMPANIONS DOMESTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds BEADS FOR EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds CHILD'S PATH INC
  • Who funds AKOLA PROJECT INC
  • Who funds MUTTVILLE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CRISIS CENTER
  • Who funds THE MAASAI GIRLS EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds FOSTERING SUCCESS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Domestic Violence Crisis Center10% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc5% of income from government
  • Guadalupe Center Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc?

Find your warmest path to Perna-Rose Foundation for Hope Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph