· Public charity
The Pegasus Foundation
Through a strategy of engaging philanthropy, THE PEGASUS FOUNDATION serves as a catalyst to help non-profit organizations acheive their goals & potential by forming partnerships, leveraging resources and educating the public.THE PEGASUS FOUNDATION seeks to inspire collaboration by organizing confrences and meetings and facilitating…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $136,664 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $161,664 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $25,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NALA'A NEW LIFE RESCUE | $74,264 |
| DARSHANS PET ORPHANS INC | $30,200 |
| MARITIME INFOMATION SYSTEM INC | $20,000 |
| CAREING FIELDS FELINES INC | $12,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNalas New Life Rescue Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $438k · revenue +1% · 31% of their budget
- DADOGS AND CATS FOREVER4× · 2020–2023 · $205k · revenue +31%
- CFCENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC4× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +279%
Funded once
- TWTHE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECTgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +47%
- FOFLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INCone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +13%
- LWLake Winnipesaukee Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +251%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
Orca conservancy is working on behalf of orcinus orca, the killer whale, and protecting the wild places on which it depends.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
Protecting india's precious wildlife from poaching, habitat loss, and human exploitation since 1995.
To protect endangered species.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Marine Sanctuary Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pettus-Crowe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nalas New Life Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds DOGS AND CATS FOREVER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds CARING FIELDS FELINES INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
- Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
- Who funds MARITIME TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INFORMATION SHARING & ANALYSIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICA HUMANE SOCIEY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE INLAND BAYS INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHALE SANCTUARY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA OCEANOGRAPHIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Winnipesaukee Association ↗
- Who funds PETTUS-CROWE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PETS BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds Busch Wildlife Sanctuary Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COMPACT OF CAPE COD CONSERVATION TRUSTS INC ↗
- Who funds Horses Without Humans Rescue Organization ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE VITAL GROUND FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF THE RANGE & THE AMERICAN MUSTANG ↗
- Who funds EQUUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knopf Family Foundation Inc · Shell USA Company Foundation · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pegasus Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Marine Sanctuary Foundation — 88% of income from government
- Center for the Inland Bays Inc — 59% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- National Marine Life Center Inc — 16% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Dogs and Cats Forever — 1% of income from government
- New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Pegasus Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Pegasus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.