Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Paula and William Bernstein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
82
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$2.1MArts & Culture$852kReligion$512kHealth$423kHuman Services$194kPublic Benefit$104kSocial Science$38kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 82 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k70 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $327k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$9.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$500,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$200,000
TEMPLE EMANUEL$76,800
CLEO PARKER ROBINSON DANCE$50,000
DENVER INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS - PEACS$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
CONGREGATION HAR HASHEM$28,000
JEWISH COLORADO$26,800
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$25,000
BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$18,000
AMERICAN BOARD OF PYSCHOANALYSIS$10,000
ADL MOUNTAIN STATES REGION$10,000
WELLESLEY CENTERS FOR WOMEN$8,500
IMAGINE FOUNDATION$8,000
DENVER CHILDREN'S CHOIR$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $192k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $500 → 14%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $250 → 14%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $250 → 14%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $3k → 17%IMAGINE FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $38k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $31k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $28k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18k → 12%BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.0M · 93 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

93 repeat relationships: 74 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

93
20

Total granted

$4.0M
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+4%

Still filing today

65%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wellesley College
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
  • TB
    THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $143k · revenue +64%
  • PB
    PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • SU
    STANFORD UNIVERSITY DR ALAN YEUNG
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +137%
  • TV
    THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
3
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
4
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
5
Cdp North America Inc

Cdp north america, inc. 's ("cdp-na") vision for the future is a thriving economy that works for people and planet in the long term. we focus investors and companies on taking urgent action to build a truly sustainable economy by measuring…

Environment
6
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
7
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
8
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
9
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
10
American Society of Civil Engineers Inc

To provide essential value to our members, their careers, our partners, and the public, asce will: facilitate the advancement of technology; encourage and provide the tools for lifelong learning; promote professionalism and the profession;…

Science & Tech
11
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
12
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Stroke Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
78/79
Grantees still filing
58/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $800,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAIndividual grant recipient: $439,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDENVER INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS - PEACS: $317,500 · OtherDENVER INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYSIS - PEACSTEMPLE EMANUEL: $224,600 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELCONGREGATION HAR HASHEM: $122,000 · OtherCLEO PARKER ROBINSON DANCE: $100,000 · OtherSTANFORD UNIVERSITY DR ALAN YEUNG: $100,000 · Other+80 more: $364,160 · Other+80 moreWellesley College: $1,147,500 · EducationWellesley College+7 more: $79,250 · Education+7 moreTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $142,500 · Human ServicesIMAGINE FOUNDATION: $40,400 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $26,200 · Human Services+7 more: $12,600 · Human ServicesPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CHILDREN'S CHOIR: $36,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM: $32,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $19,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $7,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $10,750 · Arts & CultureJEWISHColorado: $165,300 · PhilanthropyTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 · Civil RightsCONSERVATION COLORADO: $15,500 · Civil Rights+2 more: $1,100 · Civil RightsFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $26,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,467,260Education$1,226,750Human Services$221,700Arts & Culture$205,250Philanthropy$165,300Civil Rights$41,600Food & Nutrition$26,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWellesley College: $1,147,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $165,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $142,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIMAGINE FOUNDATION: $40,400 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC: $37,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDENVER CHILDREN'S CHOIR: $36,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $32,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $26,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $26,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $18,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION COLORADO: $15,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN BOARD OF PSYCHOANALYSIS: $15,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR ADVANCED PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDIES: $12,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO: $6,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH PARTNERSHIP: $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLUCY DANIELS CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHING CORPS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER YOUNG ARTISTS ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $3,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE PASS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW PERSPECTIVES THEATRE COMPANY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $1,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST: $1,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLISTEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRoaring Fork Outdoor Volunteers: $1,400 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $1,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF METRO DENVER INC: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARK PEOPLE: $1,050 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE WRITERS WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CHILDREN'S CHOIR ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BOARD OF PSYCHOANALYSIS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ADVANCED PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO MUSIC FESTIVAL & CENTER FOR MUSICAL ARTS ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY OUTREACH COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LUCY DANIELS CENTER FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD ↗
  • Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO34.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Western Union Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Mesdag Family Foundation · Alpenglow Foundation · Brady Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Paula and William Bernstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Paula and William Bernstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Paula and William Bernstein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Paula and William Bernstein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Paula and William Bernstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph