· Private foundation
The Patterson Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k65 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k151 grants · $19M
- $250k+35 grants · $37M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS | $9,000,000 |
| KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF CHILD CARE RESOURCES | $2,500,000 |
| KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS | $2,256,425 |
| EISENHOWER FOUNDATION | $2,000,000 |
| KANSAS CITY UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND BIOSCIENCES | $1,800,000 |
| MISSOURI EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION | $1,500,000 |
| FIRST HAND FOUNDATION | $1,108,900 |
| GREATER NORTHWEST KS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000,000 |
| AVILA UNIVERSITY | $1,000,000 |
| KANSAS LEADERSHIP CENTER | $1,000,000 |
| WASHBURN UNIVERSITY | $1,000,000 |
| PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC | $885,354 |
| Individual grant recipient | $850,000 |
| WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $832,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 178 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KAKansas Association of Community Foundations3× · 2022–2024 · $28M · revenue +34%
- KCKansas City University3× · 2022–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +45%
- ARAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +78% · 41% of their budget
Funded once
- KCKANSAS CHILDREN'S CABINET AND TRUST FUNDone grant, 2023 · $2.5M
- KAKS ASSOCIATION OF CHILDCARE RESOURCESone grant, 2022 · $2.0M
- KHKVC HOSPITALS INCone grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +19%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.
To enhance the life, culture, and community of South Central Kansas by connecting people who care with causes that matter.
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
Promote and provide quality healthcare for the general commuinty of Jefferson County
To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.
Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.
Improve the health of all kansans through nonpartisan research, education and engagement that support effective policymaking.
The vision of the Association is optimal health for Kansans. The Association's mission is to be the leading advocate and resource for members.
The kansas children's foundation is dedicated to providing resources including financial and emotional support to children and families across the state of kansas.
McPherson Healthcare Foundation is committed to securing, managing and allocating funds for the enhancement of facilities and services provided by McPherson Hospital, Inc. in McPherson, Kansas, and contributing, implementing and developing…
The foundation enhances the quality of life for the kansas city region through tourism advocacy and workforce development.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Ffa Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ces Best. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
158 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 158 of the 452 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kansas Association of Community Foundations ↗
- Who funds Kansas City University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds KANSAS ASSOCIATION OF CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL AGENCIES ↗
- Who funds The Eisenhower Foundation ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds KVC HOSPITALS INC ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST HAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Kansas Leadership Center ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DANE G HANSEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCK Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds KANSAS SAMPLER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STEMM FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VICTORIA COMMUNITY COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Kansas Health Science University Inc ↗
- Who funds Kansas 4-H Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GROW HAYS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Patterson Family Foundation · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Greater Salina Community Foundation · Dane G Hansen Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Northwest Kansas Community Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Patterson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Patterson Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Patterson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.