· Private foundation
The Patricia S Heyman Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $81k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $187k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT | $80,500 |
| REACH PREP | $56,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY | $22,000 |
| LAFAYETTE COLLEGE | $18,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD | $13,250 |
| ITHACA COLLEGE | $12,000 |
| THE CHATHAM ANGEL FUND | $10,000 |
| ARTIS NAPLES | $10,000 |
| GLOBAL LEADERSHIP INC | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $10,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY | $8,000 |
| CJR FUND INC | $7,500 |
| CLEMENTINE MONTESSORI | $7,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MA BOSTON | $6,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RPREACH PREP INC9× · 2017–2025 · $498k · revenue +67%
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $470k · revenue +23%
WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE4× · 2019–2022 · $78k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- TSTHE STANWICH SCHOOL INCone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +44%
- DUDREXEL UNIVERSITYone grant, 2019 · $18k · revenue +9%
- FWFEEDING WESTCHESTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To establish, organize, maintain and conduct an institution for secondary, undergraduate and graduate education in the state of connecticut, and to perform such other works of education, charity and religion. see schedule o.
Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…
Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.
To build the university of the future with a strategy propelling us from our storied past toward an ambitious, inclusive & innovative future by preparing graduates as enlightened global citizens equipped for the challenges & opportunities…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sacred Heart University Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Global Leadership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds REACH PREP INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE STANWICH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
- Who funds FUTURE 5 INC ↗
- Who funds Global Leadership Inc ↗
- Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds IONA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds SIMMONS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ITHACA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Elon University ↗
- Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds CLEMENTINE MONTESSORI ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds DREW UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Patricia S Heyman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- University of New Haven — 2% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 2% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- All Faiths Food Bank Inc — 1% of income from government
- Springfield College — 1% of income from government
- Simmons University — 1% of income from government
- Sacred Heart University Incorporated — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 0% of income from government
- Drew University — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Patricia S Heyman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Patricia S Heyman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.