· Private foundation
Patricia Bragg Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $47k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $162k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+6 grants · $7.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY | $4,000,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $1,500,000 |
| COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL | $505,000 |
| UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED | $300,000 |
| WINDWARD FUND | $300,000 |
| EXPLORE ECOLOGY | $200,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK | $170,000 |
| UNITY SHOPPE INC | $150,000 |
| CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR BIODIVERSITY | $100,000 |
| OCEAN CONSERVANCY | $100,000 |
| WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST | $100,000 |
| ANIMAL SHELTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | $100,000 |
| CARE4 PAWS | $75,000 |
| DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $990k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $947k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY2× · 2023–2024 · $4.1M · revenue +167%
- FOFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc2× · 2020–2022 · $1.5M · revenue +5%
- CECOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL4× · 2020–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +52%
Funded once
- CCECone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
- COCASA OF SANTA BARBARAone grant, 2022 · $100k
- PAPESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK-CALIFORNIAone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…
Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.
To rescue, house and rehabilitate unwanted birds and provide education to parrot owners.
California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…
The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.
To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.
The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Rona Barrett Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 165 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LAND TRUST FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds EXPLORE ECOLOGY ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHITE BUFFALO LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SARAH HOUSE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTY RAPE CRISIS AND CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ORGANIC SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NBCC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SOLUTIONS FOR SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Animal Shelter Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds HAWAII ALLIANCE FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds California Institute for Biodiversity ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE'S FUND ↗
- Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Bragg Health Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Manitou Fund · James S Bower Foundation · Towbes Foundation · The B & B Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Patricia Bragg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Patricia Bragg Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Patricia Bragg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.