· Private foundation
Bragg Health Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILDERNESS YOUTH PROJECT | $1,100,000 |
| FOODBANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY | $804,997 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER | $500,000 |
| ANIMAL SHELTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | $200,000 |
| ALPHA RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA | $150,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | $150,000 |
| PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY | $150,000 |
| LOS PADRES FOREST WATCH INC | $105,000 |
| SARAH HOUSE SANTA BARBARA | $100,000 |
| SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC | $100,000 |
| JODI HOUSE | $75,000 |
| FOOD FROM THE HEART INC | $75,000 |
| SHADOW'S FUND INCORPORATED | $50,000 |
| STRAY CAT ALLIANCE | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EDENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER2× · 2021–2024 · $506k · revenue +83%
- USUNITY SHOPPE INC4× · 2017–2020 · $126k · revenue +65%
- JHJODI HOUSE INC3× · 2018–2024 · $78k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- RGREALTY GIFT FUND TO BERKELEY EAST BAY HUMANE SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · $468k
- SBSANTA BARBARA MIDDLE SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +43%
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION OF AMERICAone grant, 2021 · $23k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule orancho coastal is dedicated to the rescue and shelter of abandoned companion animals. it encourages adoptions into loving homes and provides educational and community outreach programs designed to enhance the human-animal…
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…
The santa barbara zoo is dedicated to the preservation, conservation, and enhancement of the natural world and its living treasures through education, research, recreation and conservation.
The institute for bird populations enables science-based conservation of species and habitats by studying the abundance, demography, and ecology of birds and other wildlife.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
In addition to rescue and adoption, pet orphans provides a wide range of services including education, medical/financial, spay/neuter, and training assistance.
Spokanimal leads communities in humane/proactive ways to promote and preserve the human-companion animal bond.
The santa maria valley humane society exists to rescue, shelter, heal, place, and train dogs and cats while engaging the central california coastal community to end animal homelessness.
Rescue farmed animals and inspire people to embrace a plant-based lifestyle.
Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the most unlike its peers is Naturopathic Medical Student Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wilderness Youth Project Inc ↗
- Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Animal Shelter Assistance Program ↗
- Who funds ALPHA RESOURCE CENTER OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds PERFORMING ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
- Who funds LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA CHANNELKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds SARAH HOUSE OF SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds JODI HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FROM THE HEART INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds STRAY CAT ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SHADOWS FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds RESQCATS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NATURAL DOCTORS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds SANTA BARBARA BEEKEEPERS ASSOCIATION Attn JULIA WALTHER ↗
- Who funds Bastyr University ↗
- Who funds THE SANTA BARBARA BIRD SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NUTRITION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds World Dance for Humanity ↗
- Who funds ACADEMY OF INTEGRATIVE HEALTH & MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds THE CAT HOUSE ON THE KINGS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds ARISE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NATUROPATHIC MEDICAL STUDENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON COLLEGE OF ORIENTAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds UNITED BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Patricia Bragg Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Williams-Corbett Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Roy and Ida Eagle Foundation · Fund for Santa Barbara Inc · The Turpin-Allebrand Family Charitable Foundation · Schlinger Family Foundation · Rudi Schulte Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bragg Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National University of Natural Medicine — 3% of income from government
- Oregon College of Oriental Medicine — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bragg Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Bragg Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.