Skip to content
The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$323k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.0MEducation$219kYouth Development$98kHealth$95kAnimals$75kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $245k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VAN CLIBURN FOUNDATION INC$120,000
CASA MANANA INC$75,000
FORT WORTH OPERA ASSOCIATION INC$50,000
TEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE$25,000
HOPE FARM INC$20,000
STAGE WEST THEATRE$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER TARRANT$8,000
AMPHIBIAN PRODUCTIONS INC$8,000
W I COOK FOUNDATION INC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–26, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOPE FARM INC: $20k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $15k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $15k → 11%HOPE Farm Inc: $15k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $15k → 11%HOPE FARM INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 11 repeat orgs$592k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -10% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$575k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-10%

Still filing today

64%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    Van Cliburn Foundation Inc
    7× · 2018–2026 · $810k · revenue +240%
  • CM
    CASA MANANA INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $700k · revenue +40%
  • HF
    HOPE FARM INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $90k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • FW
    FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • FW
    FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +30%
  • FW
    FORT WORTH ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fort Worth Early Music

Public performance of baroque classical music (17th, 18th, and 19th century) using period appropriate instruments.

Arts & Culture
2
Fort Worth Academy for the Education of Children and Youth

Education of children and youth

Education
3
Waco Civic Theatre

The mission of the waco civic theatre, a non-profit organization, is to provide the heart of texas community with quality live theatre, to create an outlet for community education and participation in all aspects of productions, and to…

Arts & Culture
4
Theatre Three Inc

We are an intimate stage for everyone. Playwrights will invent, artists will risk, and audiences will be immersed in new and familiar plays they can see from all sides. Feel emboldened, entertained and intrigued rediscover and reach for T3.

—
5
The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas

Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.

—
6
Dallas Childrens Theater Inc

The mission of dallas children's theater is to inspire young people to creative and productive lives through the art of theater.to give rise to inspiring theater, dallas children's theater:- creates and produces innovative professional…

Arts & Culture
7
Opera Southwest

Professional production of opera for the public, and education about opera and the performing arts for audiences of all ages.

Arts & Culture
8
Texas Cultural Trust Council

Public arts funding

Philanthropy
9
Creative Waco

Creative waco's mission is to grow and support a thriving cultural and creative community in waco and mclennan county, texas.

Arts & Culture
10
Fort Worth Country Day School Inc

The mission of fort worth country day school is to foster the intellectual, physical, emotional and ethical development of capable students through an academically rigorous college preparatory program that integrates the arts and athletics.

Education
11
The Chamber Music Society of Fort Worth Incorporated

To promote and present the highest quality chamber music for our city and region, reflecting innovation, creativity in programming, and selection of superior musical artists. To build an informed audience for chamber music, now and in the…

—
12
Fort Worth Symphony Orchestra Association

See schedule o-to perform great symphonic music at the highest level of artistic excellence to educate, entertain, and enhance cultural life.-to present engaging music education programs for young people to foster early interest in and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stage West Theatre; the most unlike its peers is Swenson Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Van Cliburn Foundation Inc: $810,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn Foundation IncCASA MANANA INC: $700,000 · Arts & CultureCASA MANANA INCFort Worth Opera Association Inc: $325,000 · Arts & CultureFort Worth Opera Association IncFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $100,000 · Arts & CultureAMPHIBIAN PRODUCTIONS INC: $71,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $90,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE: $100,000 · OtherFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF …FORT WORTH ACADEMY: $100,000 · OtherFORT WORTH ACADEMYTEXAS AND SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE: $100,000 · OtherTEXAS AND SOUTHWESTER…ALLIED THEATRE GROUP DBA STATE WEST: $47,287 · OtherALLIED THEATRE GROUP …BRECKENRIDGE LIBRARY: $46,000 · OtherBRECKENRIDGE LIBRARYAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF: $30,000 · OtherAMON CARTER MUSEUM OFCIRCLE THEATRE INC: $30,000 · OtherCIRCLE THEATRE INCKIDS WHO CARE INC: $20,000 · OtherTARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 · Other+3 more: $38,162 · Other+3 moreHOPE FARM INC: $90,116 · Human ServicesTexas Health Resources Foundation: $75,000 · HealthWI Cook Foundation Inc: $7,000 · HealthCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $38,553 · EducationTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $10,000 · EducationCORAM DEO ACADEMY: $7,500 · Education
Arts & Culture$2,096,000Other$531,449Human Services$90,116Health$82,000Education$56,053

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $810,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetCASA MANANA INC: $700,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetFort Worth Opera Association Inc: $325,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $90,116 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTexas Health Resources Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMPHIBIAN PRODUCTIONS INC: $71,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetMAYFEST INC (DBA TRINITY COLLABORATIVE INC): $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSWENSON MEMORIAL MUSEUM: $40,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetCRISTO REY FORT WORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL INC: $38,553 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCIRCLE THEATRE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetKIDS WHO CARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY MEDICAL SOCIETY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $17,115 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCORAM DEO ACADEMY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sid W Richardson Foun…Amon G Carter Foundat…Thomas M Helen McKee …Virginia Hobbs Charit…Ann L Rhodes and Caro…Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …Garvey Texas Foundati…Fifth Avenue Foundati…R4 FoundationBnsf Railway Foundati…Frances C and William…
Sid W Richardson FoundationTX28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sid W Richardson Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Virginia Hobbs Charitable Trust Simmons Bank Trustee · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Fifth Avenue Foundation · R4 Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Frances C and William P Smallwood Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pangburn Foundation Xxxxx0006’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home